Laserfiche WebLink
8.A. - Page 340 <br /> EIR that there is case 1aw that makes that precise point!)N� single person among us here <br /> I5 FA7IJSTkAI,sa we need not be dismissive of each other's opinions. <br /> It may be k�elpful for mc to thraw the words back in yo�,ir face�.gain--with ali the respect <br /> to which you are justifiabty entitted, --of Section 30.69 of the Redwaad City Code of <br /> Ordinances, as staf�'has directed you i�the past, "...xhe granting of the exception wall nat <br /> be de:trimental to t�he public welfare or inju.rio�s to other property in the viciniiy of the <br /> subj ect property." 75 of us have said the PD"significantly degrades the aesthetics of aur <br /> neighborhaod"and will anly Iead to"..,degratiatian of the unique charac#er and qua�ity <br /> of our street,"Without splitting hairs, isr�'t that detrimentat to the pubiic welfare? <br /> I want to remind you of a fact about the Finger�arm House�s it is stated in Redwood <br /> City Hist�ric Tours,cornpiled by ottr Historia Resources Advisory Gommittee,Edited by <br /> Ken RolandelIi and He1en Graves: "This is the aldest building in Redwoad City,"Think <br /> af it tt�a�way. Iz� addition, 1�?Finger Avenue is cited, "because it is one of the few <br /> Redwood City houses ctad entirely in brick.'° While I gather vur Arlington <br /> neighbarhood, of which Finger Avenue is a part, does not meet the criteria for an His#oric <br /> District,these examples of�istaric fact s�au2d b�hanored. The nortl� ,side af Fiz�ger <br /> A�enue has been described as semi-rural. Kindly think a�sa of the neighbarhood as do�s <br /> a neighbor wnose resgonse I see in the EIR: "Finger Avenue is one of tt�e rnost ancientiy <br /> wooded neighborhoods in San Mateo County, arid its gentie antiquity is what makes this <br /> s�ch a special place."Gentle antiquity; a felicitaus turn af p�rase,dan't you think? <br /> Wtiat we neighbors want is the continuation of a gaoc� user experience. We are the cnd <br /> users here. We�aak forward ta welcorning new neighbaxs who appreciate the iook and <br /> fee2 af the neighbvrhaod. And we do not oppose change per se. <br /> Mr. McGowan should not be denied his property right�o build four new hovses to replace <br /> those that are teardo�ns.. Tfh�ahonses to do that,that is fine and it is his right. But <br /> Plaianed Development pertnits grant permission from the Ciiy. Those permits are ta be <br /> granted pursuarxt to the objectives of Pla�rned Developxneacits. Mr. McGowan's prapos�I <br /> does not meet thase objectives. 3'herefore 1 want my City to exercise its right tv deny the <br /> application for the project he's pxesented,to build nine houses in the way that he <br /> proposes, �'erhaps then, Mr. McGowan will choase ta act more like Paul Powers,and <br /> return with an alternative that we can all agree is a good plan for th� sitc. <br /> Whsn the framers were drafting the Dec�azation of Independence, ar� eaxly ve�sion said <br /> all men were endawed by their Creator with"certa�n inalienable rights, that among these <br /> rights were"life, liberty ar�d property."The edit,suggested by Jeffersan and supported by <br /> Benjamin Franklin and the rest, replaces`�roperty"with "t�e pursuit c�f happiness,"* <br /> Those are the words T live by. <br /> The faotnote 13 on page I 13 of the First Amendment to ihe Axaft Focused E�R Report, <br /> Finger Avenue Nine-Lot Planned Development suggests no City respanse may be <br /> reqaired unless requested. Accordingly. I herehy request a response and, as aYwa.ys, I <br /> appreciate youz�good work. <br />