Laserfiche WebLink
8.A. - Page 452 <br /> REDIEV-K���t�n Iwees <br /> From: Linda Vetter<silvercharm�patbell.neta <br /> Sen#: Sunday,June 17, 2012 8;24 PM <br /> To: GRP-Planning Commissiorters <br /> Subject: Finger Avenue Project <br /> pianning Commissioners, <br /> We see chat the Finger Avenue Fraject is back a�ain. From what we ca€�tsll no substantial changes have been <br /> made since it was�ast up for cnnsideration. Things tike the creek setback, rvadway design with inareased traffic <br /> and parking isst�es, massiveness of the pmject and its compatibility with the sutzrotzncfing neighbvthapo lvok to <br /> be cantinuing problerns. <br /> In a demacraey progress aften means campromise with none af'the varions int�rest groups gett�ng everytt�ing <br /> exactly the way they w�t it. I't appears to us that the developer in this �ase refixses tu do anythi�xg major to <br /> scale back the scope of this project. A cynie wautd assu,nnne the developer has peneiled in the exa.ct aevelopznera�t <br /> they want to maximize their profit�zd wil! t�ot compromise, Tf t�ey get their wish, they wil! t�.lce thair mfaney <br /> and be gone and the cammtinity, incluaing t�e owners of these homes, wiIl be Ief�to deal with the consequences <br /> for the long term. 1'hat isn't right. <br /> We urge you to reject this current proposa� for the �'inger Avenue Praject. <br /> Thanks, <br /> T�rry B[anchard/Li�da Vetter <br /> 216 Finger Avenue <br /> Redwood City, CA 9406� <br /> i <br />