Laserfiche WebLink
8.A. - Page 465 <br /> on each site. The subject Finger Avenue nine-lot subdivision project provides adeqt�ate o .ff- <br /> street parking to serve its future residents and guests, and need not conduct an analysis of <br /> future commercial development along the El Camino Real. <br /> COMMENT: This comment concerns FEIR Comment/Response I-l2 involving the development af <br /> the project alternatives <br /> RESPONSE: The FEIR text cited ir�this comment that t�e alternatives were develaped by <br /> the EIR preparers(and not the applicant) is accurate. The project alternatives were devised by <br /> the City staff and EYR consultant, and were pr�sented in their ultimate form in dra�vvings <br /> prepared by the project's civiZ enginaer for cansistency with the site's base map and to ensure <br /> some level of engineering feasibility. The nature of each alternative was based on the <br /> Settlement Agreement terms and the City staff and ETR consultants' independent professional <br /> judgment to help identify ttte environmental, planning, and urban design trade-offs inherent <br /> in developing the site in the various alternative layouts presented in the Draft EIR. The Iayout <br /> of each alternative in terms of]ot configurations, number and placement of units, access <br /> points to Finger Avenue, etc. was developed by the City staff and EIR consultant(save the <br /> Creekside Green Alternative suggested by the commentor}. Therefore, each alternative <br /> reflects the City's unbiased approach (as lead agency responsible for preparation ofthe EIR}, <br /> nat the influence of the applicant or the project's civil engineer. <br /> Finger Avenue Nine-Lot Planned Development Projeci 11 Responses to FEIR CommenEs <br /> City af Redwood City June 2012 <br />