Laserfiche WebLink
6.2.A. - Page 2 <br /> ALTERNATIVES <br /> There is no alternative regarding the request for the additional $6,675 as the work has <br /> been completed and funded by the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund, and the <br /> final Redevelopment Agency Report has been issued. <br /> The Successor Agency may reject the recommendation to conduct the audit services for <br /> $17,000 and direct staff to issue a request for proposal for auditing services to perform <br /> the DDR's. However, given the lack of clarity regarding the work to be done for the <br /> DDR's, along with tight deadlines required by the State, some audit firms are not <br /> providing this service to their existing clients. <br /> FISCAL IMPACT <br /> The additional $6,675 for the January 31, 2012 audit has been approved by the <br /> Oversight Board and the State Department of Finance and has been funded by the <br /> Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (formerly tax increment). At this time, a <br /> funding request for the additional $17,000 for the two DDR's has been submitted on the <br /> third Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule, and if this item is approved by all <br /> parties, funding will be provided by the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT <br /> Not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act. <br /> ��f`t^-- <br /> BRIAN PONTY <br /> DIRECTOR OF FINANCE <br /> �� <br /> ROBERT B. BELL <br /> CITY MANAGER <br /> ATTACHMENTS <br /> 1. Amendment No. Four to Agreement for Auditing Services <br /> RELATED DOCUMENTS IN CITY CLERK'S OFFICE <br /> None <br />