Laserfiche WebLink
7.A. - Page 1 <br /> RE PO RT <br /> To the Honorable Mayor and City Council <br /> From the Cit Mana er <br /> October 8, 2012 <br /> SUBJECT <br /> An Ordinance to Amend Sections 5.1 and 5.80 of Chapter 5 of the Redwood City Code <br /> Pertaining to Regulations for Animal Control; County Regulations Adopted <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> 1. Conduct a Public Hearing <br /> 2. Waive Second Reading and Adopt an Ordinance to Amend Sections 5.1 and 5.80 of <br /> Chapter 5 of the Redwood City Code Pertaining to Regulations for Animal Control; <br /> County Regulations Adopted. <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> At the September 10, 2012 City Council Meeting, an ordinance to amend Sections 5.1 <br /> and 5.80 of Chapter 5 of the Redwood City Code pertaining to regulations for animal <br /> control was introduced, and an October 8, 2012, public hearing was set. The proposed <br /> ordinance adopts San Mateo County's animal control regulations by reference and <br /> adopts the same fees as adopted by the county. State law requires that a public <br /> hearing be held when codes are adopted by reference. <br /> ANALYSIS <br /> Licensing and other animal control fees are set and collected by the County, as a <br /> means of cost recovery for this mandated program. The cities contracting with the <br /> County for animal control services, including Redwood City, must maintain the same <br /> animal control and licensing program fee structure as the County. To accomplish this, <br /> Redwood City's Municipal Code Sections 5.1 and 5.80 must be amended to reflect the <br /> changes in the County's ordinance. <br /> As required by state law, notice of this public hearing has been appropriately published, <br /> and the proposed ordinance and a certified copy of the County ordinance being adopted <br /> by reference are available in the City Clerk's office for public review. <br /> ALTERNATIVES <br /> Section B.1 of the City's agreement with San Mateo County for animal control services <br /> requires the City to maintain the same animal control licensing and fee structure as the <br /> County; therefore there is no alternative to the recommended action. <br />