My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
OB Min 2012-04-12
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
Oversight Board Minutes 2012
>
OB Min 2012-04-12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2012 1:09:38 PM
Creation date
10/12/2012 1:09:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
Oversight Board
Date
4/12/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
and the issues associated with it. He shared specific amounts <br /> that have been deposited and the figures relating to the <br /> ROPS. Ms. Ramirez explained that this will not show on the <br /> next ROPS. One Member suggested this be footnoted so <br /> that the history is captured. Questions were posed about the <br /> Housing Fund. Since the County Auditor did validate the <br /> payment, as "pass through", the consensus was to shift this <br /> item to page four. The assumption discussed was that since <br /> the County accepted this obligation it will make the <br /> payments. One Board Member requested information about <br /> the total budget for Affordable Housing. The Legal Aid <br /> Society agreement and details were discussed. One Board <br /> Member noted that maybe this payment could be phased <br /> out. Mr. Ponty offered to call them and inquire if that was <br /> possible. City Attorney Thompson said she would review <br /> the agreement. Mr. Navas changed his request to not <br /> footnote the item on the Legal Aid Society; but, instead wait <br /> for the information and possibly shift it to the second ROPS. <br /> On the $862,000 amount paid it was suggested this be paid <br /> out in the next year and not the current one. <br /> Various Oversight Board Members made comments about <br /> the situation they are in and the fact that this is an <br /> unfortunate situation to be in. Nonetheless, the role of this <br /> Board is to unwind the RDA. The State obligations to <br /> community colleges were discussed and a full break down <br /> was shared by Member Christensen. Mr. Navas explained <br /> that the charge of this board is to wind down the affairs of <br /> the RDA. <br /> Mr. Ponty continued with his explanation of each of the <br /> items on the second page of the ROPS. Some questions <br /> were asked of staff regarding Bradford Street. The Heller <br /> Street affordable housing was also mentianed. The items <br /> that were going to come off in the next ROPS were covered. <br /> A copier machine was discussed and how expenses are <br /> allocated. Mr. Lyon provided details. Staff was asked if the <br /> assets and the obligations are tied together on the <br /> Affordable Housing end and Ms. Ramirez confirmed. One <br /> Member would like to see the pre-existing agreements <br /> related to this. This item to remain in the ROPS. <br /> One Board Member wanted to have staff inquire with the <br /> State Department of Finance about the obligations related to <br /> employees that were not 100% allocated to the Agency. <br /> Staff confirmed that it will pose the question. Ms. Freeman <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.