My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
OB Min 2012-05-01
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
Oversight Board Minutes 2012
>
OB Min 2012-05-01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2012 1:10:25 PM
Creation date
10/12/2012 1:10:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
Oversight Board
Date
5/1/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
M/S Christensen/Navas to approve the Minutes for April 12, 2012 with <br /> minor revisions. Motion carried unanimously by voice vote. <br /> One Member wanted greater clarity on why certain items were not on <br /> the agenda and responded to, but the minutes said these were going to <br /> be addressed at today's meeting. She asked if Mr. Ponty had flagged <br /> everything that should be at the next agenda. He responded that it is <br /> helpful if there is consensus on what is to be addressed at the next <br /> meeting. <br /> Member Navas suggested reordering a certain item on the Agenda. <br /> Chair Holland concurred and moved agenda item VII to the front of <br /> agenda item V. <br /> Item VII was addressed first. <br /> VII. Oral Communications from the Successor Agency Contact <br /> a. Update from State Department of Finance Brian Ponty <br /> b. Update on Audit Brian Ponty <br /> c. Update on Legal Expenses Pamela Thompson <br /> Mr. Ponty provided some clarifying comments about the ROPS before the <br /> Board which is revised and it includes the corrected citations. On page <br /> three the change was the funding source for the Successor Agency and <br /> an addition (item 21) (of page one) relating to the audit of the former <br /> redevelopment agency. <br /> Mr. Ponty noted that the Department of Finance (DOF) informed staff <br /> that they were disallowing certain items. He provided further details on <br /> which items of the first ROPS were disallowed. Mr. Ponty cross <br /> referenced those items and row numbers to the current ROPS in front of <br /> the Oversight Board and noted the changes made. Ms. Ramirez said that <br /> the only items disqualified were items six and seven, and that the DOF <br /> requested further information and they identified other items as <br /> administrative costs. Mr. Ponty cross referenced the items from the <br /> letter to the first ROPS that had been approved. He provided details on <br /> various bonds that had been issued to clarify the items on the ROPS. <br /> Ms. Thompson, City Attorney, was asked to respond to items related to <br /> the legal budget. She handed out a proposed budget of$24,000 and <br /> commented that to date $2,500 has been spent. Mr. Ponty continued <br /> explaining the items which were disallowed item by item. On item #9 Mr. <br /> Ekern, Director of Community Development, provided details on the <br /> agreement between City Hall and the US Postal Service. Regarding item <br /> #16 (legal fees for Mr. Labadie) the Department of Finance believes this <br /> should be within the Administrative Budget. Ms. Ramirez said that staff <br /> is trying to work with the Department of Finance to provide additional <br /> information. She also said staff is asking for time to review the details, <br /> the first ROPS, and possibly the second ROPS. Mr. Labadie added that <br /> such items cannot be processed until the Department of Finance <br /> approves them. <br /> Mr. Ponty then provided an update on the audit of the Redevelopment <br /> Agency. The Chair said since this is completed then move to item V and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.