My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2004-01-12
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2004
>
AgdaPkt 2004-01-12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2006 8:41:14 AM
Creation date
1/8/2004 1:25:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
1/12/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> .: <br />AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE 60, ZONING MAP NO. 17 (FARM HILL <br />NEIGHBORHOOD), OF ORDINANCE NO. 1130, THE REDWOOD CITY ZONING <br />ORDINANCE, AS AMENDED, TO REZONE PROPERTY AT 1025 LAKEVIEW <br />WAY IN THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY FROM THE RESIDENTIAL-HILLSIDE <br />40,000 SQ. FT. MINIMUM LOT SIZE (RH-40) TO RESIDENTIAL-HILLSIDE 20,000 <br />SQ. FT. MINIMUM LOT SIZE (RH-20) <br />The motion passed by a unanimous roll call vote. MINUTE ORDER 03-291 <br />D. Appeal of the decision by the Zoning Administrator to deny an Architectural Permit <br />for the construction of a new single family house at 3738 Laurel Way <br />Senior Planner Ekas gave the report stating that in 1988 a Council policy was <br />approving establishing that an environmental impact report (EIR) be provided for <br />the remaining vacant parcels on Laurel Way. An application has been received for <br />development on one of the vacant parcels and the application was rejected <br />because it did not come with an improvement plan and environmental impact <br />report. She explained that this is not an appeal of the Zoning Administrator's <br />decision, but a challenge of the City Council policy related to environmental <br />review for future development on Laurel Way. She reviewed the subject site. the <br />setting of Laurel Way. gave a brief history of the Council policy on Laurel Way, <br />closing with environmental review and what the California and Environmental <br />Quality Act (CEQA) requires the City to do. In conclusion. Senior Planner Ekas. <br />stated that the staff. as former Councils have reviewed Laurel Way, continues to <br />support existing Council policy. The policy does not preclude development, but <br />simply requires a process to get to development. Furthermore, it complies with <br />CEQA; and ensures the city and the adjacent hillside residents and affected <br />Laurel Way property owners that the environment impacts of future development <br />will be mitigated resulting in a safe, well planned and adequately serviced <br />neighborhood. <br />Mayor Ira opened the public hearing. <br />Public Comment: <br />Roger Flores. appellant, clarified some statements he noted in the staff report <br />such as the square feet should be 3,495 rather than 4,018. He stated that the <br />plans submitted were conceptual in order to get on the Council agenda tonight. <br />He stated that the property is actually 51 feet wide at the top and widens going <br />down and that the slopes have been described as being very steep with extreme <br />slopes, difficult terrain and severely substandard infrastructure such that the <br />Council established a policy requiring an EIR. He stated that most of the lot <br />decreases are at a relatively uniform rate and not excessively steep and the <br />Planning Department study on Laurel Way shows his lot has an average slope of <br />29%. He further stated that the City has allowed development on Laurel Way for <br />some with slopes in excess of 37%. He stated that all EIR experts he has talked <br />to state that single family lots are exempt from an EIR. He stated that if he <br />JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND BOARD OF EQUALIZATION DECEMBER 8. 2003 <br />MEETING MINUTES PAGE 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.