My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2004-01-12
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2004
>
AgdaPkt 2004-01-12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2006 8:41:14 AM
Creation date
1/8/2004 1:25:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
1/12/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> .' <br /> stated that there is a lot of benefit statewide and for Redwood City for that <br /> alignment to be studied fully. He stated his hopes that the City Council considers <br /> being a part of an aggressive statewide effort to lobby for an increase in Federal <br /> funding for high speed rail in California and that the City becomes part of an effort <br /> to encourage state, regional and local entities to include high speed trains in their <br /> planning. He stated his concerns with the system and asked that at a later date <br /> support or thoughts on the position be offered. <br /> Melissa Hippert, conservation representative with the local chapter of the Sierra <br /> Club, clarified that there is a designated wilderness area within Henry Coe State <br /> Park in which two of the proposed rail routes would transect. She stated that the <br /> Sierra Club has gone on record in support of high speed rail. She further <br /> explained the four proposed routes, two of which involve Henry Coe State Park. <br /> She stated that the Sierra Club would like to see the project built with minimal <br /> environmental impact and the Chapter has undertaken a campaign with two main <br /> messages. One is to have the High Speed Rail Authority remove the Coe routes <br /> from consideration. The second issue is to bring Altamont back in for the reasons <br /> previously mentioned. <br /> M/S Ruskin/Howard to extend the meeting until 11 :10 p.m. The motion passed by <br /> a unanimous voice vote. <br /> Michael Kiesling stated there are many reasons why the Council should support <br /> Altamont, but explained one in particular. The project as proposed would go from <br /> San Francisco to San Francisco Airport, to Redwood City to San Jose, and then <br /> either over the hills of the valley or further south to Gilroy and over the valley. If the <br /> Altamont route were chosen. it would go San Francisco. San Francisco Airport, <br /> Redwood City and across the bay picking up Fremont and out to Pleasanton. An <br /> alignment would also come from San Jose to Fremont and out. He stated the <br /> difference means that Redwood City would be compelled to build parking garages <br /> and deal with all the traffic coming to downtown Redwood City. <br /> D. Council Member Howard - announced a boat tour of five Redwood City Harbor <br /> on sites on December 16 at 1 :00 p.m. The location to meet is at the Marine <br /> Science Institute Dock. <br /> E. Vice Mayor Pierce - announced that on Thursday from 7-10 p.m., December 11, <br /> at the Veterans building there would be a continuation of the Courthouse Plaza <br /> Design. <br /> 9. ADJOURNMENT - 11:10 p.m. <br /> M/S Foust/Hartnett to adjourn until the next Special City Council meeting of December <br /> 15, 2003. The motion passed by a unanimous voice vote. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND BOARD OF EQUALIZATION DECEMBER 8, 2003 <br /> MEETING MINUTES PAGE 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.