Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> GA~l <br /> \lLJF 1frlll11 ~I! 1 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · . . . . · . . . · . . <br /> Legislature Questions Use of Section 27.00 is a continuous appropriation and no further legis. <br /> lative action is required, <br /> The Governor referenced Section 27.00 of the <br /> 2003-04 Budget Act as a basis for his actions. What should city officials do in light of this <br /> Chesbro's letter asserts that the Section 27.00 controversy? Most city officials we talk with are <br /> authority is a "limited delegation of legislative moving cautiously in this tenuous environment. <br /> powers to allow the Administration to address That seems to a prudent course of action. Certainly <br /> unexpected circumstances after the passage of the no major commitments to new programs or spend. <br /> budget." The letter goes on to argue that this ing should be made during the remainder of at <br /> section is " . . . intended to allow adjustments to least this fiscal year. Some group with a stake in <br /> spending amounts. consistent with the Legislature's state general fund programs could challenge the <br /> policy objectives as reflected in the annual budget. Governor's actions. It is not clear if the Legislature <br /> It is not intended to provide an alternative to the plans to move beyond the objections in the Joint <br /> regular budget process for changing policy deci- Legislative Budget Committee letter and take its <br /> sions," The letter further argues that the own legal action. <br /> Governor's action does not meet the criteria for an <br /> "emergency" and that no "specific evidence" has City and county officials have done a good job <br /> been put forth that justifies the use of this authority. of making the Legislature aware of the political <br /> Under this Section 27.00 authority in the budget consequences of taking action to cut or jeopardize <br /> local government funding. Reneging on the state's <br /> act, the Governor argues that he can make a commitment to backfill VLF cuts will be a difficult <br /> "deficiency appropriation" to meet the obligation to vote for any Legislator. That doesn't mean we're <br /> pay the VLF backfill. The Joint Legislative Budget home free. Nothing is safe as long as the Legisla. <br /> Committee letter argues to the contrary that a ture is in session. <br /> deficiency appropriation only allows the Administra. <br /> tion to "spend at a rate which would necessitate an The next stage in this "dance" that will play out <br /> additional appropriation" and that to make the over the next 6 months is the Governor's proposed <br /> appropriation for this purpose" . , . requires the 2004-05 state budget. He is scheduled to release <br /> Legislature to approve an appropriations bill by that budget sometime around January 9~. The <br /> March 1, 2004." budget proposal should clearly indicate where the <br /> What Next on VLF Payments? Administration stands on continued VLF backfill <br /> payments or some other alternative for local gov. <br /> It is no surprise that the Legislature is unhappy ernment funding. <br /> with the Governor's actions. The letter from Sena- Local Services Need Constitutional Protection <br /> tor Chesbro was expected and sets the groundwork <br /> for further debate on this issue when the Legisla- The lesson in all of this for local government <br /> ture returns in January. officials is that the only way to put local government <br /> back on a course of fiscal stability is to pass a <br /> In the meantime. the Administration is moving constitutional protection measure on the November <br /> ahead with its plan to honor its commitment to local 2004 ballot. If there was ever any doubt about <br /> government. It is our understanding that the De- proceeding with a ballot measure, the uncertainty <br /> cember 26~ payment of VLF backfill revenues to generated about VLF funding in recent weeks <br /> the counties for the social service realignment reinforces the need to place some reasonable <br /> program was made and that the scheduled January restriction on the Legislature's ability to use local <br /> 10 payment to cities and counties will also be made government revenue as its personal ATM machine. <br /> on time. Consult the CITIPAC website (www.citipac,oral or <br /> your regional representative for more information <br /> It is also reported that the Administration plans on how you can help with this effort. <br /> to continue making VLF backfill payments after the <br /> March 1st deadline referenced in the letter from <br /> Senator Chesbro because the VLF backfill revenue <br /> PAGE 2/PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the league's Official Web Siteuwww.cacities.org <br />