Laserfiche WebLink
Harvesting the finished compost is easily done when the tiers are restacked to turn the pile. <br /> <br /> Caoacity: How much material can the bin hold? '" .' <br /> <br /> With a capacity of 13 cubic feet the Biostack.CompOster is larger than the other bins we ..... <br /> seriously considered (I0 cubic feet and I2 cubic feet). Additional tiers ~n bc added; each <br /> additional tier adds 4.2 ctibic feet. In a 'survey conducted by thc Alameda County Waste .- . . <br /> Management Authority (A~WMA) of'residents currently using thc Biosmek C6mposter in <br /> Alameda County, 69% said the capacity was just right and 29.% ',S:iid they could use more <br /> capacity. The 29% who wanted more capacity could benefit from the t,se of an additional <br /> tier,. <br /> <br /> Initial Qttantity of Binc To Be Distdl~uted <br /> <br /> Recommendation: Identify two program pl~a~es with 2.500 bins to be distributed in <br /> Phase 'l and 5,000 to be'distributed in Phase II. Plan additional <br /> phases as needed to provide continuous bin distribution. <br /> <br /> Quantity Ratitmale <br /> <br /> Currently, achic¥ing participation in backyard composting 'by 30% of the ,:ingle family <br /> households in a jurisdiction is considered admirable. Many ju'risd~cti0ns have established <br /> .goals in thc 20-30% range. There arc 175,000 singlc family through four-plex units in San <br /> lvlateo County. A 30% participation rate would mean 52,500 households composting on-site. <br /> Over a 5 year period (time remaining until compliance with thc year 2000 goal is mc.muted) <br /> slightly more than I0,000 households would need to be added each year to achieve this goal. <br /> We anticipate that Phase I (2,500 bins) and Phase II (5,000 bins) will be complete in less <br /> than one year based on the experienc~ of Other jurisdictions. For example, 8425 Biosmck' <br /> Comp6stcrs were distributed in Alameda County in a one year period. Demand was there for- <br /> a larger number of unit~ but operational'issues unique to the Alameda County program <br /> created gaps between distribution phase. <br /> <br /> While we anticipate latent dema3d in San Marco Co}.nty, we wot, Id like to ~mulatc <br /> immediate action by residents. We believe that by ah-fioi~ncing an initial dist'i~t,tion of <br /> 2,500 bins we can create an atmosphere of 'get it while it lasts." '* <br /> <br />Thc final consideration in selecting a distribution quantity was thc manufacturer's price <br />· schedule. ^ price break is offered at quantiti~ of 2,500 :ind 5,000: If .Ph:ue II immediately <br />foilovCs phase I, a retroactive credit will be i.~ued on the first'purchasc of 2,500 equal to the . .. <br /> price discount offered at a purchase quantity of 5,000. -. <br /> <br /> Exhibit 'A.' - Page 4 of 8 : <br /> <br /> <br />