My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agmt96 Browning Ferris BFI
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agreements
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
Agmt96 Browning Ferris BFI
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:40:35 PM
Creation date
1/12/2004 12:12:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Agreement
Contractor Name
Browning Ferris Industries BFI
PROJECT NAME
franchise agreement
RMP File Number
100 bin 12
Date
1/1/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Program Deinils nnd Selection Rntionnle <br /> <br /> Program Adminirtratton <br /> <br /> Recommendation: San Marco County Department of Public Works. Waste <br /> Managcment Division <br /> <br /> Bin Seleclion <br /> <br /> Bin Recommendation: The Biostack Composter'manufactured by Smith & Hawken ":." <br /> <br /> The Biostack Composter consists of three bottomless tiers stacked on top of each other and a <br /> hinged lid.' The basic bin size O'tiers) is 13 cubic feet. Additional' tiers Can be added; each <br /> additional .tier adds 4.2 cubic feet. It's made of 60% recycled polyethylene. <br /> <br /> Selection Rationale <br /> <br /> Numerous pilot studies have been completed by other jurisdictions involving both <br /> experienced and novice compostcrs to evaluate various compost bins. The San Marco <br /> County Compost Bin Task Force reviewed man~y of these pilot studie~ and determined that <br /> enough information already existed in the completed studies to select an appropriate bin for <br /> San Mateo County residents without conducting an additional pilot study. <br /> <br /> To select a bin using existing studies the task force first prepared a list of evaluation criteria <br /> · and a-~igned points to the criteria to indicate each criteria's relative importance. The <br /> evaluation studies were then reviewed ,'md three bins were identified as candidates. " <br /> Jurisdictions using one or more of the bins were contacted for feedback. We also contacted ' <br /> each of the manufacturers. After considering all of the available information, the Biostack <br /> Composter was selected as the best bin for San Mateo County residents. A summary of how <br /> the binZrated on the criteria identified as most important (listed below in descending order) ." <br /> follows. : <br /> <br /> Effectiveness: How effective is the bin at producing finished compost? <br /> <br /> The Biostack Composter's patchier three tier design is suitable to many types of users. The <br /> user interested in producing compost quickly will be able to do so easil.~;. Frequent turning of <br /> the pile mixes and aerates the materials resulting in rapid decomposition and quick results. <br /> The three tier design makes turning the pile easy. The stackable tiers are simply tmstacked <br /> and restacked and th.e initial pile is scooped into the new stack: Alternatively, for the user : <br /> interested in a-low maintenance process, the three tiers can be used effectively for' Iow input. -. <br /> slow composting by leaving the initial stack intact and letting the materials compost inside <br /> un,'u;sisted. <br /> <br />· While the low maintenance process works, we believe it is best to promote an active process. <br />The active compoaler will be rewarded by the quick production of finished compost which ' .' <br /> <br /> Exhibit "A.' - Page 2 of 8 : : <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.