Laserfiche WebLink
8.B. - Page 2 <br /> service reserve fund and, if necessary, to initiate foreclosure proceedings. No City <br /> funds are pledged to repay the debt service on these bonds. The annual debt service <br /> and administrative expenses currently average about $900,000 and are allocated to <br /> property owners based on their amount of improved property within the CFD. <br /> Since the inception of the CFD, there have been no delinquencies in the payment of <br /> special taxes. <br /> On September 25, 2012 this refunding was discussed with the Council Finance <br /> Committee (Council members Ira, Seybert, and Bain) who authorized staff to move <br /> forward with the refunding. On November 5, 2012 the Council approved its selection of <br /> the financing team. <br /> ANALYSIS <br /> Refunding bonds are typically sold to take advantage of lower interest rates and reduce <br /> debt service payments. The Government Finance Officers Association's "Best Practice" <br /> recommendation is that a refunding generate cash flow savings with a net present value <br /> (NPV) (i.e., have value in current dollars) equal to at least 3% of the amount of <br /> refunding bonds issued in order to justify the expenditure of resources necessary to <br /> implement the refunding. NPV savings estimates based on current interest rates are <br /> approximately $1.5 million, or 14% of the proposed par amount of refunding bonds. <br /> While it is more likely than not that interest rates will not rise dramatically before the <br /> proposed refunding bonds can be sold in January, there can be no assurance that rates <br /> will remain low until the refunding bonds are sold and that savings of this magnitude will <br /> be achieved. <br /> TONIGHT'S ACTIONS <br /> Principal documents relating to the proposed refunding bonds are substantially <br /> complete. The Council is being asked to approve those documents in substantially final <br /> form in order to allow staff to implement the sale of refunding bonds. With the exception <br /> of the preliminary official statement (Attachment 3), and the special tax formula, which is <br /> an appendix to the preliminary official statement, all other documents are on file with the <br /> City Clerk. Summary descriptions of all documents are included as an attachment to <br /> this staff report (Attachment 4). <br /> The resolution staff recommends that the Council approve will authorize the underwriter <br /> to distribute the preliminary official statement. The resolution also provides that the <br /> refunding bonds may be sold if the following conditions are met: the principal amount of <br /> the total bonds issued in connection with the refunding does not exceed $11,550,000, <br /> the underwriter's discount does not exceed 1.0 % of the par amount of refunding bonds <br /> sold, and the NPV savings are equal to or greater than 4% of the amount of refunding <br /> bonds issued. The requested bond authorization is larger than the estimated <br /> preliminary bond size to allow for sale of bonds at an original issue discount (OID), <br /> which marketing structure requires the issuance of more debt to make up for the lower <br /> proceeds received from OID bonds. An OID marketing structure would only be used if it <br />