Laserfiche WebLink
B. San Mateo County's Draft 2003 Congestion Management Program (209) <br />Community Development Services Manager Patterson explained that this is a <br />countywide plan that comes up every two years and manages the congestion <br />within the county so that funds will go to areas with most congestion, pooling <br />resources from the entire County. He stated that there is not much change <br />although there is more emphasis on bicycles, pedestrian and shuttle service. He <br />further stated that a letter had been sent to C /CAG suggesting that one idea might <br />be to initiate a clearinghouse type process where any information on shuttle <br />services could be pooled together. Although the residents in Redwood Shores <br />appeared to like the service but because dealing with taxi companies that have <br />certain financial problems the necessary insurance could not be obtained. <br />Council comments included adding a comment in a letter to address revising the <br />housing requirement to one half mile rather than one third mile distance to the <br />transit hub. <br />C. Hallmark Apartments Acquisition /Rehabilitation Project — CITY COUNCIL AND <br />REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (405) <br />Housing Coordinator Jones - Thomas explained the project and some revisions. <br />The project is an existing apartment building being converted into affordable rents <br />for the residents. The first change pertains to the number of units designated as <br />HOME units which is changing from 90% affordable and 10% very low, to 30% <br />very low and 70% at low income. She further stated that there is more benefit to <br />the City if the $500,000.00 is used toward the acquisition as opposed to the <br />rehabilitation. If the 13% is designated as HOME units it subjects the project to <br />prevailing wages. <br />Mark Hyatt, of KDF Communities, explained the proposed project, the experience <br />in these types of projects and the financing that will be used. <br />Council Members expressed concerns about the reduction in HOME units and the <br />purpose of avoiding prevailing wage payments pointing to the recent policy <br />approved for support of prevailing wages. <br />Recess: 8:55 — 9:15 p.m. <br />City Attorney Yamamoto referred to a policy adopted in 1988 by the <br />Redevelopment Agency stating that it provides that the Agency desires that the <br />prevailing wage policy be applied uniformly throughout the project area. The <br />second policy referred to earlier was adopted on October 13, 2003 and is only a <br />policy of the City Council. That policy speaks to the issue of City Council being in <br />support of California State law requiring contractors and sub - contractors on public <br />projects to pay construction workers wages at least equal to the wages prevailing <br />SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND DECEMBER 15, 2003 <br />REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING MINUTES PAGE 4 <br />MINUTES Book No. 60 <br />Page No. 125 <br />