My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2013-01-14
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
AgdaPkt 2013-01-14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2013 8:49:52 AM
Creation date
1/10/2013 4:10:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency
Date
1/14/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
662
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.B. - Page 99 <br /> Redwood City Chapter 4.Environmental Impact Analysis <br /> Standard Condition 4.8-1 (2007 FEIR Standard Condition 4.8-1): The project shall comply with <br /> seismic design criteria in the California Building Code,the City's building standards,and other <br /> pertinent building regulations. <br /> a-3.Seismic-relatedground failure,including liquefaction? <br /> Less-than-Significant New Impact with Mitigation Incorporated.The California Seismic Hazard <br /> Zones,Palo Alto Quadrangle identifies the project area as being within a potential liquefaction <br /> hazard zone.During a major earthquake at one of the regional faults,violent groundshaking can <br /> result in ground failure due to liquefaction. Liquefaction is a transformation of soil from a solid to a <br /> liquefied state during which saturated soil temporarily loses strength resulting from the buildup of <br /> excess pore water pressure,especially during an earthquake.Lateral spreading,differential <br /> settlement,loss of bearing,ground fissures,and sand boils are evidence of excess pore pressure <br /> generation and liquefaction.Soil susceptible to liquefaction includes loose to medium dense sand <br /> and gravel,low-plasticity silt,and some low-plasticity clay deposits.According to the Geotechnical <br /> Investigation Report prepared by Kleinfelder(2006),investigations have historically encountered <br /> liquefiable soils on the project site. <br /> Areas susceptible to liquefaction also have high ground water levels (within 40 feet below ground <br /> surface [bgs]).As described in the 2007 FEIR(page 4.8-4),the groundwater level on the project site <br /> is expected to be at a depth of between 10 and 15 feet bgs.Based on the soil and groundwater <br /> conditions on the site,the potential for liquefaction is moderate. Mitigation Measure 4.8-2 <br /> (Mitigation Measure 4.8-2 in the 2007 FEIR [page 4.8-5]) requires the project to comply with <br /> liquefaction prevention measures. Implementation of this mitigation would be consistent with <br /> Program PS-23 in the General Plan and would reduce new seismic-related ground failure impacts to <br /> a less-than-significant level. <br /> Mitigation Measure 4.8-2 (2007 FEIR Mitigation Measure 4.8-2): The project shall comply with <br /> liquefaction prevention measures,as necessary,as stated within the State of California Mining <br /> and Geology Board Publication 117,"Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards <br /> in California." <br /> a-4.Landslides? <br /> No New Impact. Landslides and other slope failures are secondary seismic effects that are common <br /> during or soon after earthquakes.Areas that are most susceptible to earthquake-induced landslides <br /> are steep slopes underlain by loose,weak soils,and areas on or adjacent to existing landslide <br /> deposits.The project site is relatively flat and within a fully developed area.There are no steep <br /> slopes near the project site and the area is not included or adjacent to an earthquake-induced <br /> landslide zone. Hence,the project area has a very low probability for an earthquake-induced <br /> landslide to occur.As a result,implementation of the proposed modifications would not expose <br /> people or structures to substantial adverse effects involving landslides and no new impact would <br /> occur. <br /> b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? <br /> Less-than-Significant New Impact.As described in the 2007 FEIR(Appendix A,page 9),the project <br /> site is not located in an area where a high potential for soil erosion is present.A majority of the <br /> project site is covered with impervious surfaces which would allow for a very minimal erosion of <br /> topsoil. Due to the developed nature of the project site,construction activities associated with the <br /> Addendum No.2 to the Environmental Impact Report for 4-54 September 2012 <br /> the Redwood City Costco Wholesale Project ICF 00154.12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.