AgdaPkt 2013-01-28 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

7.A. - Page 25 Commission meeting. (Appeal, pp. 9-10.) Appellant does not identify any particular alleged violation. In addition, Appellant complains that the owner of Pete's Harbor, Paula Uccelli, made misleading statements in letters to her tenants. (Appeal, p. 3.) City's Position: Appellant's non-specific, generalized grievance does not serve as a basis for appeal. Appellant has not provided "any supporting information, materials and documents the appellant requests be considered by the reviewing body during the appeal hearing." (Zoning Code § 48.4.) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City more than satisfied its legal obligations to provide notice of the Planning Commission meeting (see, e.g., Zoning Code § 49.4 and Gov. Code § 65901) including by: • Mailing notice to property owners and tenants within 300 foot radius of the site on October 3, 2012, including the State Lands Commission. • Publishing notice in the Redwood City Daily News on October 6, 2012. • Mailing notice to BCDC, C/CAG, San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board, California Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (responsible agencies). • Mailing notice to Save the Bay, Diana Reddy, and Chamber of Commerce (interested parties). • Providing on-site postings at Pete's Harbor, Villas at Bair Island, Marina Pointe and One Marina.' • Appellant's contentions that the property owner has misled her tenants raises issues relative to the landlord-tenant relationship, not the adequacy of any legally required notice associated with the City's process relating to the proposed development. Thus, this is not a valid grounds for the Appeal. In any event, the property owner and/or applicant have conducted public outreach with the stakeholders at Pete's Harbor, including a meeting with all tenants on September 20, 2012, and a meeting with the restaurant operator on September 19, 2012. Further, the property owner and/or applicant has met with owners and interested parties from nearby properties and businesses, such as the residents, purchasers and Homeowners' Association board members of One Marina Pointe and the management of The Villas at Bair Island, as discussed in the October 30, 2012, Planning Commission Staff Report at page 14. B. Affect on Neiqhborinq Property Values (Appeal, p. 7) ' Appellant suggests that notice should have been posted at the site after filing of the application, as well as prior to the September 19, 2012, architectural review hearing. (Appeal, p. 3.) There is no such legal obligation. Page 25 of 27