AgdaPkt 2013-01-28 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

7.A. - Page 208 Pete's Harbor Gity ot Redwood Gity EIR Addendum October 8, 2012 Page 3-45 impacts to a less-than-significant level, Impact 10-1 should be identified as significant and unavoidable "until an achievable water supply sourced is identified." Mitigation 10-1 described the State requirement for a subsequent water supply analysis, reflecting City progress on its water supply and conservation strategies. The current Pete's Harbor project water demand is already factored into the City's most recent UWMP (which was adopted in 2010, after the 2003 project), and the impact on water service demand would be less-than-significant. Mitigation 10- 1 is no longer required. Impact 10-2 Analysis: Project-Related and Cumulative Impacts on Sewage Treatment and Transmission Capacity. As discussed in the 2003 EIR, the Marina Shores Village project would have generated a net increase of approximately 317,000 gallons of wastewater per day (gpd), with the previous Pete's Harbor component contributing about 105,000 gallons of that net increase. Based on the same formula from the 2003 EIR, the currently proposed Pete's Harbor project would generate a net increase of approximately 64,000 gpd, approximately 60 percent of the previous Pete's Harbor wastewater generation. However, the identified significant project-plus-cumulative sewage treatment and transmission capacity impact would remain because: (1) the South Bayside System Authority (SBSA) treatment allocation to Redwood City would still be exceeded, and (2) infrastructure modifications to the wastewater transmission system would still be required. Conclusion. Modified impact and mitigation. Impact and Mitigation 10-2 have been modified to reflect current, improved conditions, as well as sewage treatment and transmission capacity improvements implemented as part of the One Marina development ("Peninsula Marina" in the 2003 EIR) under construction south of the Pete's Harbor site. The modified mitigation remains sufficient to reduce the impact to a less-than-significant level. Impact 10-3 Analysis: Project-Related Increase in Police Service Demands. The certified 2003 EIR concluded that buildout of the Marina Shores Village project would have required approximately four additional sworn police officers and requisite training, support staff, facilities, and equipment (based on an estimated on-site net population increase of 3,910 residents). The current Pete's Harbor project would result in a net population increase of approximately 745 residents' (i.e., an 80 percent reduction from the previous Marina Shores Village estimate) and a proportional reduction in the need for additional police services. Therefore, the current Pete's Harbor project would require the equivalent of about 0.8 additional sworn officers, which generally would be funded from project property taxes. Conclusion. Modified impact and mitigation. Impact and Mitigation 10-3 have been modified to reflect the reduced project. Although the current Pete's Harbor project would result in reduced demands for additional police services, the 2003 EIR-required mitigation--completion of a staffing survey, etc.--remains applicable to the current Pete's Harbor project and remains sufficient to reduce this impact to a less-than-significant level. Impact 10-4 Analysis: Emergency Response and Evacuation Impacts. The certified 2003 EIR identified the possibility that project-related traffic congestion in the vicinity could inhibit emergency response and evacuation capabilities. The associated mitigation included: (1) implementation of ineasures included in EIR chapter 7 (Transportation and Circulation) to 'The Pete's Harbor property is estimated to have 110 current residents (855 - 110 =745 on-site net population increase). T.�1106951Addenduml3(10695-01).doc