Laserfiche WebLink
MiG 7.A. - Page 215 <br /> City of Redwood City EIR Addendum <br /> October 8, 2012 Page 3-52 <br /> 3.9 PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY <br /> The relationships of the current Pete's Harbor project to the 2003 EIR public health and safety <br /> impact and mitigation conclusions are described below. <br /> Impact 12-1 Analysis: Safety Impacts Related to San Carlos Airport. The 2003 EIR <br /> concluded that the proposed project would be located within the restricted height area of the <br /> San Carlos Airport planning area. This condition still applies to the current Pete's Harbor <br /> project. <br /> The associated 2003 EIR mitigation required: (1) project review by the City/Council of <br /> Governments (C/CAG) of San Mateo County, in its designated role as the County Airport Land <br /> Use Commission (C/CAG Board); (2) applicant submission of a Notice of Proposed <br /> Construction orAlteration; (3) possible granting of an Avigation Easement; and (4) the transfer <br /> of appropriate disclosure documents to buyers and renters which include an acknowledgment of <br /> potential nuisance and safety issues associated with the site's location near the airport. <br /> The current Pete's Harbor project is located within the restricted height area for the San Carlos <br /> Airport (i.e., the C/CAG Board review threshold). The maximum proposed building height, <br /> however, has been reduced from 240 feet to 75 feet on the Pete's Harbor property (under the <br /> FAA review threshold of 200 feet), and no General Plan Amendment or rezoning is required for <br /> the current Pete's Harbor project. Therefore, the project does not meet the threshold for C/CAG <br /> Board review. <br /> Conclusion. Mitigation 12-1 is no longer required. The impact would be less-than-significant. <br /> Other Impacts. The 2003 EIR determined that the previous Marina Shores Village project <br /> would have less-than-significant impacts resulting from future on-site hazardous materials use <br /> and disposal, project exposure to existing hazardous materials contamination, potential <br /> asbestos exposure, interference with emergency response plans, and potential electromagnetic <br /> field (EMF) health hazards. The current Pete's Harbor project includes no changes or new <br /> conditions that would affect these conclusions. <br /> T:1106951Addenduml3(10695-01).doc <br />