AgdaPkt 2013-01-28 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

7.A. - Page 236 MEG Pete's Harbor City af Redwood Ci#y EIR Addendum October'!0, 2012 Page 3-45 impacts to a less-than-significant �e�el, fmpact 10-1 should be identif ied as significan#and una�oidable "unt�l an achi e�able water suppEy sourced is identified." Mitigation 10-1 described the State requirement for a subsequent water supply analysis, reflecting City progress on its water supply and conser�ation strategies. Ths current Pete's Harbar project water cEemand is already factored into the City's most recertt UWMP {which was adopted in 2010, after the 2003 praject), and the impact on water service demand would be less-than-significant. Mitigatian 10- 1 �s no Eanger required. Impact 90-2 Analysis: Prnject-Related and Cumulative Impac#s on Sewage Treatment and Transmission Capacity. As discussed in the 20Q3 EIR, the Marina Shares Village praject wauld have generated a net Encrease of approximately 317,OOD gallons of wastewater per day (gp�), wi#h the pre�ious Pete's Harborcomponent contributing abaut 105,000 gallons of that net increase. Based an the same formuia fram the 2Qa3 E1R, the currentiy praposed !'ete's Harbor project would generate a net increase of approximate�y 64,000 gpd, approximately 60 percent of the previous Pete's Harbor wastewater generation. [some texf has been delet�d] Conclusion. Redwood City Engineering staff ha�e determined that sewage treatment ar�d transmission capacity exists far the current Pete's Harbor project due to current, impro�ed conditions, including substan#ial ongoing w ater conservation efforts and improvements throughout the city, as well as sewage treatment and transmission capacity impro�ements implemented as part of the One Marina de�elopmen# ("Peninsula Marina" in the 2003 EIR) under cor�struction south of the Pete's Harbor site. Unfi ke in 2003, the City no lor�ger exceeds its Stage 1 treatment a(�ocation from the South Bayside System Authority (SBSA). The impact on treatment and transmissian capacity would be less-than-signrfrcanf Mifigation 10-2 is no Eonger required. Impact 10-3 Analysis: Project-Related Increase in Police Service Demands. The certified 2003 EIR concluded that buildout af the Marina Shores Viflage project would have required approxima#efy four additionai sworn palice officers and requisite trainir�g, support staff, facilit�es, and equipmenf (based oR an estimated on-site net papufation increase of 3,910 residents). The current Pete's Harbor project woufd result in a net papulation increase n f approximately 745 residents' (i.e., an 80 percent reduction from the pre�ious Marina Shores Vilfage estimate) and a proportional reduction in the need for additional police services. Therefore, the current Pet�'s Harbor project wauld require the equivalent af about O.S adclitional swarn officers, which generally wou�d be funded from project property taxes. Conclusian. Modified impac#and mitigation. Impact and Mitigation 10-3 have been modified to reffect the reduced project. Aithough the current Pete's Harbor project would result in reduced demands for additional police services, the 2�03 EIR-required mitigation--completion of a staffing survey, etc.--r�mains applicabfe to the c�rrent Pete's Harbor �roject and remains sufficient to reduce this impact ta a les�-than-srgnrficant level. 'The Pete's Harbor property is estimated to have 110 current re5idents ($55- 110 =745 on-site net population increase). T I106951Addenduml3(]0695-01f-rev doc