My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2013-03-11
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
AgdaPkt 2013-03-11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2013 4:28:35 PM
Creation date
3/7/2013 4:37:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
3/11/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
921
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.A. - Page 49 <br /> Redwood City Chapter 4.Environmental Impact Analysis <br /> Less-than- <br /> Potentially Significant New Less-than- <br /> Significant Impact with Significant <br /> New Mitigation New No New <br /> 4.2.AESTHETICS Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> Would the project: <br /> a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic ❑ ❑ ❑ � <br /> vista? <br /> b. Substantially damage scenic resources, ❑ ❑ ❑ � <br /> including,but not limited to,trees,rock <br /> outcroppings,and historic buildings along a <br /> scenic highway? <br /> c. Substantially degrade the existing visual ❑ ❑ ❑ � <br /> character or quality of the site and its <br /> surroundings? <br /> d. Create a new source of substantial light or ❑ ❑ � ❑ <br /> glare that would adversely affect daytime or <br /> nighttime views in the area? <br /> Aesthetics <br /> Impact Discussion <br /> The regulatory environment and existing conditions related to aesthetic resources remain the same <br /> as described in the 2007 FEIR.The new General Plan includes the following new policies and <br /> programs that are applicable to the proposed modifications: <br /> Policy BE-1.8: Require that new projects are integrated as seamlessly as possible into <br /> surrounding development,creating extensions of the urban fabric. <br /> Policy BE-1.9: Carefully consider new shade,shadow,light,and glare effects from proposed <br /> development projects and comprehensive plans. <br /> Policy BE-19.8: Require that new and renovated industrial properties and structures exhibit <br /> quality design and continued to be maintained. <br /> Program BE-15: Title 24 Lighting Zone. Require all new development and redevelopment <br /> within Redwood City to be in compliance with Title 24 Lighting Zone (LZ-3)requirements. <br /> Encourage the use of low mounted,downward casting exterior lighting for all new development <br /> in the city,so as to reduce light trespass onto adjacent properties. Further,require new <br /> developments to submit lighting and photometric site plans for City review and approval prior <br /> to the issuance of individual building permits. <br /> As discussed below,with implementation of the standard conditions identified in the 2007 FEIR,the <br /> proposed modifications to the project would not result in any new or more severe significant <br /> aesthetic impacts beyond those previously addressed in the 2007 FEIR and 2007 Addendum No. 1, <br /> and there are no other changes in circumstances,or new information that would necessitate any <br /> major modification of the aesthetic resources discussions in the 2007 FEIR and 2007 Addendum No. <br /> 1. <br /> Addendum No.2 to the Environmental Impact Report for September 2012 <br /> the Redwood City Costco Wholesale Project 4-5 ICF 00154.12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.