Laserfiche WebLink
7.A. - Page 119 <br /> Redwood City Chapter 4.Environmental Impact Analysis <br /> Table 4.12-2.Annual Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br /> Emission Type Emissions [metric tons/year COze] <br /> COZ CH4 NZO COZe <br /> Vehicle Trips 20.5 0.002 0.001 20.55 <br /> Vehicle Queuing (263.61) (0.01) (0.01) (265.68) <br /> Annual Emissions (243.56J (0.01J (0.00J (245.13J <br /> BAAQMD Threshold - - - 1,100 <br /> Exceed Threshold? - - - No <br /> Source:Ashworth Leininger Group 2012. <br /> b. Conflict with an applicable plan,policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the <br /> emissions ofgreenhousegases? <br /> No New Impact.The state has adopted several policies and regulations for the purpose of reducing <br /> GHG emissions.The most stringent of these is AB 32,which is designated to reduce statewide GHG <br /> emissions to 19901evels by 2020.As discussed in Section 4.12.a,annual GHG emissions associated <br /> with the proposed modifications are expected to be significantly lower than GHG emissions <br /> associated with the existing 12-station fueling center.The project would reduce GHG emissions from <br /> the facility by more than 26 percent;therefore,the project meets or exceeds the AB 32 goal of <br /> achieving at least 22 percent decrease in BAU emissions by 2020. No impact would occur. <br /> Addendum No.2 to the Environmental Impact Report for 4 75 September 2012 <br /> the Redwood City Costco Wholesale Project ICF 00154.12 <br />