My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2013-03-11
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
AgdaPkt 2013-03-11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2013 4:28:35 PM
Creation date
3/7/2013 4:37:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
3/11/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
921
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ProK 7.A. - Page 181 Redwood City GDF Expansion <br /> Air Gtuau�yi�.urna�e�.nanye r�nalysis <br /> Appendix B: Operation Emission Calculations <br /> Table B-1. Operation Emissions-Summary. <br /> Chan e in Dail Criteria Pollutant Emissions Associated With Pro osed Pro�ect Pounds er Da . <br /> Emissions(Pounds per Day) <br /> Project Component ROG NOx PM�o PM2.5 CO SOZ <br /> Proposed Expansion(20 Fuelinq Positions) <br /> Vehicle Trips 1.41 1.55 1.56 0.42 14.65 0.02 <br /> Vehicle Queuing 0.04 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.57 -- <br /> Gasoline Delivery Trucks 0.06 1.20 0.08 0.05 0.28 0.00 <br /> Vehicle Refueling 16.52 <br /> Total Dail Emissions Chan e ounds/da 18.03 2.80 1.63 0.47 15.50 0.02 <br /> Extreme Maximum Assumptions <br /> Vehicle Trips 4.35 4.79 4.81 1.30 45.26 0.06 <br /> Vehicle Queuing 1.07 1.28 0.04 0.04 14.41 -- <br /> Gasoline Delivery Trucks 0.06 1.20 0.08 0.05 0.28 0.00 <br /> Vehicle Refueling 16.52 <br /> Total Daily Emissions Change(pounds/day) 22.00 7.27 4.93 1.39 59.95 0.06 <br /> BAAQMD Siqnificance Thresholds(pounds/day) 54 54 82 54 None None <br /> Si nificant? No No No No N/A N/A <br /> Chan e in Annual Criteria Pollutant Emissions Associated With Pro osed Pro�ect Tons er Year . <br /> Emissions(Tons per Year) <br /> Project Component ROG NOx PM�o PM2.5 CO SOZ <br /> Proposed Expansion(20 Fuelinq Positions) <br /> Vehicle Trips(Proposed Project) 0.22 0.24 0.26 0.07 2.29 0.00 <br /> Vehicle Queuing 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.10 -- <br /> Gasoline Delivery Trucks 0.01 0.22 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.00 <br /> Vehicle Refueling 3.02 <br /> Total Annual Emissions Chan e tons/ ear 3.25 0.46 0.27 0.08 2.43 0.00 <br /> Extreme Maximum Assumptions <br /> Vehicle Trips 0.64 0.71 0.78 0.21 6.83 0.01 <br /> Vehicle Queuing 0.19 0.22 0.01 0.01 2.42 -- <br /> Gasoline Delivery Trucks 0.01 0.22 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.00 <br /> Vehicle Refueling 3.02 <br /> Total Annual Emissions Chan e tons/ ear 3.86 1.15 0.80 0.23 9.30 0.01 <br /> BAAQMD Siqnificance Thresholds(tons/year) 10 10 15 10 None None <br /> Si nificant? No No No No N/A N/A <br /> Chan e in Annual Greenhouse Emissions Associated With Pro osed Pro�ect Metric Tons er Year . <br /> GHG Emissions Metric Tons er Year <br /> Project Component COZ CH4 N20 COZe <br /> Proposed Expansion(20 Fuelinq Positions) <br /> Vehicle Trips(Proposed Project) 20.05 0.002 0.001 20.53 <br /> Vehicle Queuing (263.61) (0.008) (0.006) (265.60) <br /> Gasoline Delivery Trucks 29.79 0.001 0.001 30.11 <br /> Total Annual GHG Emissions Chan e metric tons/ ear 213.77 0.005 0.004 214.96 <br /> Extreme Maximum Assumptions <br /> Vehicle Trips 563.17 0.052 0.040 576.53 <br /> Vehicle Queuing 276.10 0.008 0.006 278.18 <br /> Gasoline Delivery Trucks 29.79 0.001 0.001 30.11 <br /> Total Annual GHG Emissions Chan e metric tons/ ear 869.05 0.060 0.047 884.82 <br /> BAAQMD Siqnificance Threshold(metric tons/year) 10,000 <br /> Si nificant? No <br /> Notes: <br /> 1. Under the Extreme Maximum Assumptions,daily trips for the proposed 20-position GDF are assumed to double from existing <br /> levels for the 12-position GDF, per City of Redwood City staff,July 2012. This affects emissions associated with vehicle <br /> trips and vehicle queuing,as demonstrated in Tables B-2 and B-3. Note that the extreme maximum assumption that existing <br /> facility vehicle trips will double is extremely unlikely. This is because for this to occur,the proposed facility's weekday <br /> averaqe hourly vehicle trips would need to be 75%higher than the existing facility's weekday peak hour vehicle trips. <br /> Page 1 Date: 7/30/2012 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.