My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Ord 2393
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Ordinances
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
Ord 2393
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2013 4:41:43 PM
Creation date
3/27/2013 4:41:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Ordinance
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency
Date
3/25/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
03/25/2013 <br /> 1. OVERVIEW AND INTRODUCTION <br /> These findings are made with respect to the "Project Approvals" (as defined <br /> below) for the Reusable Bag Ordinances (the "Project") to be adopted by the <br /> County of San Mateo (the "County") and various municipalities in the County and <br /> in Santa Clara County and state the findings of the Board of Supervisors (the <br /> "Board") of the County relating to the pofential environmental effects of the <br /> Project. <br /> The following findings are required by the California Environmental Quality Act <br /> ("CEQA"), Public Resources Code Sections 21081, 21081.5 and 21081.6, and <br /> Title 14, California Code of Regulations (the "CEQA Guidelines") Sections 15091 <br /> through 15093, for the Project. <br /> Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081 and CEQA Guidelines Section <br /> 15091, no public agency shall approve or carry out a project where an Environ- <br /> mental Impact Report ("EIR") has been certified, which identifies one or more <br /> significant impacts on the environment that would occur if the Project is approved <br /> or carried out, unless the public agency makes one or more findings for each of <br /> those significant impacts, accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale of <br /> each finding. The possible findings, which must be supported by substantial <br /> evidence in the record, are: <br /> a. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the <br /> Project that mitigate or avoid the significant impact on the environment. <br /> b. Changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of <br /> another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by <br /> that other agency. <br /> c. Specific economic, legal, social, technological or other considerations make <br /> infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the <br /> EIR. <br /> For those significant impacts that cannot be mitigated to below a level of signifi- <br /> cance, the public agency is required to find that the specific overriding economic, <br /> legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the Project outweigh the significant <br /> impacts on the environment. As discussed in detail below, the Project would not <br /> result in any significant unavoidable effects; all potential impacts identified by Draft <br /> Program EIR and Final Program EIR are either beneficial or less than significant <br /> such that no mitigation measures are required. <br /> The Project EIR determines that no siqnificant impacts on the environment would <br /> occur if the Project is approved or carried out and onlv identifies impacts that <br /> would be considered less than siqnificant without need for mitiqation and impacts <br /> that would be considered beneficial to the environment. Findings for each of the <br /> 2 <br /> ORD.#2393 <br /> FORMERLY MUFF#305 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.