Laserfiche WebLink
e) Recommendations ta�duee impac�a to the drainage improvements fram <br /> expansive sails; <br /> � Recommendations to reduce the potential for post-construction slope <br /> instability in the vecinity of siYe improvements; <br /> g} Recommendatio�ns for general site�rading, inc�uding c�ts, fills,and <br /> aarrective grading mea.sures;and <br /> h) Recommendations for stabilizing home site:a by s�pporting the homes and <br /> any site retaining wa�ls on drillod piers. <br /> Midg�tion Mea:ure Genlogy-3:The soils excavated fo�r installation of the wate.r <br /> line a#the property boundary bdween Lots 1 Q and 11 sha11 be ro-graded to <br /> original condition.s wilesa the site-sp�cifio geofecl�nicaZ report:r�quize�by <br /> mit[gation me.asur�Geology-2 reoomme,�ds othe�measures for slope stabilization <br /> of Lots 10 �nd 11. <br /> Mfitigation Mea�ure Geology-4; The portion of the geotec�nical rcport <br /> addressing slope stabilitY,recl�red by mitig�tion meaeure Geology-2,shail be <br /> submitted with the Tree Remaval Permit application frn'revicw by the Redwood <br /> City Landscape Architect. The reoornme�dations specific to#��moval may <br /> inc�ud�,but not be liinited to,the followi�g; <br /> • Recommendations for prev�ting soil creep and landslides during <br /> con�tcuc�ion,if necessary,such as te�po�axy exr.ava�ion support systems; <br /> • ltecn:mmendatioas ta reduce the probability af landslide and soil creep after <br /> construction; and <br /> � R�commeadations for sta,bilizing slopes during the rlrilling of piers far <br /> fot�datians. <br /> Finding; Implemenfatian of Mitigation Measures Gealogy-1 thrangh Geology-4 would <br /> re�uce impa�firom soi]creep and soil instability ta a less than signifiaant level. <br /> Faet�in Support of I+�ndfng; Impleme�tt�tion afMitigation Me,�sure Geology-1 would reduce <br /> irnpa�fiom soil cree� and soil instahility by requiring implementation of the <br /> recammendatione ine�uded in the geotechnacal feasibitity dacuments prepsred for <br /> the site. Implernentat�nn of Mitigation Measure Geolagy 2 wou�d reduce itnpacts <br /> by requiring campXetivn o�de�ign-level geotecl�aica�investigatians for each lot <br /> and the utili#y improveme�ts on Laurel Way aud implernea�tation of the <br /> revommend�#ions in the investigal�an.Mitigation M�asure Gealogy-3 wo�ld <br /> minimize rumpacts from sail c�eep and soil insfability by�uiring r�grading of <br /> soils at the Uoundary between I.o� ]0 and T 1 to original conditions following <br /> water line installation,or requiriag other measures ta aclueve slnpe stabiliza�ion. <br /> 1Vl�tiga.tion Measure G�ology-4 would also reduce impacts from soil eceep and <br /> soil instabilitY bY re4uynn8 submittal af slope stability information from the <br /> g�atechnical repart required by Maitigatioa Meagure Geology-2 with the Tnee <br /> Removal Permit, for review by�e Redwood Gity Laudscape Architect,who shall <br /> make recommendations, as necessary,to preserve slope stability.Impact 3.5-2 <br /> and propased mitigation are d�cxibed on Draft EIR pages 3.5-12 thraugh 3.5-15 <br /> 25 <br />