Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> [ . I <br /> <br /> CD.A-?J <br />- 3. Lower the tracks below the street level. This alternative allows easy <br /> pedestrian and vehicular access, but is very costly to build. Major utilities <br /> would have to be relocated, but that is not an impossible task. <br /> All of the above altematives create significan, impacts within Redwood City. The <br /> station facili,y may also be located in Redwood City. A station capable of handling <br /> 6,000 passengers each day would also have to be accommodated. The size of <br /> this facility and required parking has not been estimated. <br /> Clearly, the Program EIRIEIS does not provide sufficient information to make an <br /> informed decision. Because of the significant impacts, this system would have on <br /> many communities on the Peninsula, it might be beneficial for the Cities to work <br /> together to come up with a design proposal that we all agree upon. That proposal <br /> could then be included in the next phase of environmental studies. This would allow <br /> the Cities to be proactive, not reactive. <br /> Conclusion <br /> Howard Goode from the Transportation Authority will be present to discuss these two <br /> projects, and answer any questions you may have. <br /> Fiscal Impacts <br /> The Measure "A" Renewal includes money for station access planning and <br />- improvements. Redwood City had asked for funding to help plan the area within the <br /> Downtown as part of the Renewal Plan. <br /> /~ 41L,¡ <br /> joeyÞatterson Bruce Liedstrand <br /> ,¡Manager, Engineering and Construction Community Development Services Director <br />, !) LiY <br /> Ed Everett <br /> City Manager <br /> jp:ss <br /> sIIibrary/joel/cDunciLCaltrsin Service - Baby BuileLHigh Speed Rail <br />- <br /> -3- <br />