Laserfiche WebLink
7.A. - Page 91 <br /> in expanding its large develap�ent pZan to Pefe's Harbnr,will have totally eradicate,d <br /> ���lic baati�g from two farmerly very active s�ad vibrant pubticly-accessible rna�inas. <br /> In 2008 dtze ta conaidera#ions ttot specitical�y knawn to SPH,but po�entially due to tne <br /> ecoz�ozny and the Pauls Corporatian's des�r:,to foe�s on Peninsula Pa�'k(now 4ne Marina <br /> }, any plans for deveiapment of Pete's Har6ar w�re removed frorn tEte�lanning process, <br /> talcen off the pt�bIic recvrd,and no t�iscussion of develapment has occurred since 2d08. <br /> a ns uen f e and n� u lic ac ' n ' e 2 ' has ot il <br /> �xnex�ience of residents and vo�ers�nor_the eneraI�ublic t�at an extensive un b�ic <br /> co ent re ardin develo ent th' lands-end o�n <br /> �pna�ite is true—despite_the_slig�y scaled back nature of e Pe ' arbor portian <br /> tha ra i n' current 1 t s e'ec#ed this t e v ment an na <br /> one has consider�d a�:y a�tive�rv�osal on i�since 2008. <br /> "Curre�t f�ng a�td �r�posaI—intentianal campaign or unintended anfortu�ate <br /> series o#'events?" <br /> in Iuly 2012 Mr�, Uccelli included in rent-bill envelopes a letter stating that tl7ere was <br /> current interest in developing the property, but not revea.ling that a plaz�filing was <br /> imminertt. Many residents who pay their bi11s on a regalar basis b�vvalking i.n tn the <br /> office, did not see t�rat mailing,and no separate mailing was done. Days Iate:r t�e Pauls <br /> Corporation filed its proposal. No pu�lic posting was made nfatty�ling in JuIy,Aug�t <br /> or September,on�the prpperty,on�he website, in rent bills or othervvise. <br /> In mid-Septeml�er Mrs. Uccelli serit a letter in a separate mailing irnviting residents to a <br /> coffee on�hhe ear�y mornaaag a�`September 2Q, 2Q�2, wifhout mantianing#hat#Paere was an <br /> archxte�t�al revi�v hoard("�,RB°,)public hear�g the day before. Tt�e September Ietter <br /> also stated that the Tuly letter had adviseci ke�aants that a develop�r had�Ied plams, which <br /> �s an untrue statement,as the Ju�y letter n�ver mentioned the developer's filing. <br /> No notice ofpublic hearing for the ARB meeting was posted at the property,o�n t�e <br /> website, in rent bills, or otherwise. Two fi�.11 preciaus mantl�s were �ost within which <br /> residents and members afthe pttblic could�btain and review the prapvsals, relevant <br /> history and impactang issues. On September 20, Mrs. Uccelli,�he developer and a city <br /> con�raet e�ployee were present at t�e zneeting, and ad�vised tenat�ts that ifthe Planning <br /> Com�nission ad�pted t�e Resolutian on Octaber 16, 2012,eviction ntitices would be <br /> iss�ed promptly and tenants would be given"GO tv�4S"days z�otice, with �zll�acatacy <br /> expected no 4a�er t�ian mid-January 2013,Tt�e develaper revealed plans t� fuily shut <br /> down the site, apparently with na raac� access to the state lands. <br /> "Se�tember 2Q,2Q12 �re�kfast meeHng and res�onse" <br /> A��unaber a�very cancerned residents ex�ressed the�iardship experienced by boaters in <br /> �ind'vng].ocal empty s�ips due to waitit�g Iists vccasioned by clemand and the 10%BCDC <br /> liveaboard cap, and others noted that tl�ose that must sell in lieu of relacating would be <br /> ur�able to,or seriousl�+ltarmed, in the dead af winter when t�e market for selling baats is <br />