Laserfiche WebLink
7.A. - Page 93 <br /> across from th�protected apen s�ac�fede3-af reserve. SPH will cantinue its public nptic� <br /> drive regardless af the outcorne of the Resalu�tivn vo#e,anc�may drive toward initiative to <br /> itnpact this development if necessary. <br /> Fina�ly, it shouls�be n�ted that a number of c�rrent resid�r��s wau�d be more vQCal and <br /> active if not£or tl�e owner's community involvement and fea�r of pc�tential retaliation, <br /> incluc�uig eviction,harassment andlar b�acklisting frorr�othe�tocal marinas.Tl�ere have <br /> been actaons ta support these fears since residents began organizing into SPH. <br /> Sources of informatio�r: <br /> Wordpress blog: htt�:ilsa�ve�etesharb�r.wc�rc��ress.c�m/ <br /> Change.arg pe�ition: http://www.change.orglpeti�ions�searchlpete's�arbox <br /> T�va letters from Pete's Harbor Owner tv residents(submitted in�o the pubtic record as <br /> a#tachments)3uly ZD12 and September 2�12.NOTE: September lettear e:rroneously states <br /> that the July letter advised fenants of a fiiing of developer's plans when in fact the 7uly <br /> 1et�er�redated that �lxa�g and d�d"nnt"advise a�an imnainent develope�r filing. <br /> Three lefters fronn Pe�e's Harbar 4wr�er to residents �itt �e past(su�rnitted into the <br /> public record as at�achments) stating that no changes fo the harbor and ma.rizxa were going <br /> to F�appen. <br />