My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2013-05-06
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
AgdaPkt 2013-05-06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/21/2013 9:53:40 AM
Creation date
5/2/2013 4:20:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
5/6/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
266
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.A. - Page 127 <br /> The project before us does not in�lude a �ive-aboard component.The project application we have <br /> recei�ed is for the rerr�oval af the existing docks from the smaller lease area and the installation af a <br /> hand launch ramp. <br /> GK <br /> On Apr 19, 2013, at 8:53 AM, "CD-Bill Ekern° <�ekern redwoodcit .or >wrote: <br /> Grace <br /> Does your li�e aboard analysis anticipate requiring t{�em or only al�owing them? <br /> be <br /> Sent from my iPhone <br /> qn Apr 18, 2013, at 3:51 PM, °Kato, Grace@SLC" <Grace.Kato@slc.ca.�ov>wrat�: <br /> Bil4: The CA State Lands Commission staff intends to recommend the Cammission rely on the City's <br /> CEQA Analysis when considering the application for#he lease assignment and amendment. In order to <br /> do so however,we have the tollowing comrr�ents: <br /> • Staff will need to recei�e the amendment to Ar�dendum #2 (we cannot rely on the Redwoad City <br /> Council's d2termination for CEQA Compliance� <br /> • Please include a brief explanation in the amendment to Addendum#2 of the decision nat to <br /> prepare a subsequent EIR �ursuant ta §15162 of the State CEQA Guidekines (Title 14, <br /> §15164(e)). <br /> • Determination whether any of the changes in the en�ironment due to the new proposed <br /> activities will not cause a "new significant en�iranmental effect of a substantial increase in t�e <br /> se�erity of previously identified significant effects." (7itle 14, §1516z �a)(1)). The preparation of <br /> a supplemental EIR is triggered if any new significant environmental effect of a substantial <br /> increase in an environmental effect is found. <br /> � All new activities associated with the praject are covered in the amendment to Addendum #2, <br /> not only those impacts to water q�ality <br /> • Staff would like to see an assessment af any potential impacts to Air Quality and Greenhouse <br /> Gas Emissions from the use of the hoorr�truck and barge in this project. If assessments from the <br /> ZQ03 EIR or Addendum#2 cover this impact, please pravide Commissian staff with where the <br /> assessments are located <br /> • Staff would like to see any patentia� impacts to Biological Resources frorn the introduction of <br /> Aquatic Ir�vasi�e Species {AIS}. San Francisco Bay is aiready under stress frorr�AIS and the CEQA <br /> review of this project should assess whether the use of the bargQ and other in-water <br /> construction equipment will introduce and spread AlS in the Project Area. <br /> Additionalfy, if Redwood City has received additional informatian on the project d�scription from the <br /> applicant, please provide staff with a completed project descriptian, including, but not limited to: <br /> • How many pil�s and boat slips will be removed <br /> � Proposed Work windows <br /> • Where the old piles, docks,and boat slips are being dispased <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.