Laserfiche WebLink
aT6.1.H. - Page 4 <br /> 1017 Middlefield Road <br /> Redwood City, California 94063 <br /> Telephone: (650)780-7070 <br /> Fax: (650)366-2447 <br /> E-mail: mail@redwoodcity.org <br /> May 20, 2013 <br /> President Barack Obama <br /> The White House <br /> 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW <br /> Washington, DC 20500 <br /> RE: Preservation of the Municipal Bond Tax Exemption <br /> Dear President Obama: <br /> On behalf of the City of Redwood City, I am writing to share our concerns with provisions included in the <br /> White House's FY 2014 budget proposal that seek to end the long-standing tax exempt status of <br /> municipal bond interest. The tax exemption has been a successful cornerstone of state and local <br /> infrastructure development for over 100 years, and is responsible for financing a majority of the nation's <br /> infrastructure. <br /> In the City of Redwood City, the tax exemption on municipal bonds has contributed to the advancement <br /> and completion of a great number of critical infrastructure projects including the $76,940,000 Recycled <br /> Water Project. Prior to the Recycled Water Project, the City of Redwood City was entirely reliant on one <br /> source of potable water—San Francisco's Hetch Hetchy regional water system —and had, over a period <br /> of years, purchased water in excess of the amount San Francisco was obligated to deliver to the City. <br /> The Recycled Water Project provided tertiary treated non-potable, recycled waste water to customers <br /> for landscape irrigation and industrial uses, and artificial surfaces at athletic fields, thereby reducing the <br /> reliance on the regional water system. <br /> This type of project could not be completed with the infrastructure financing replacement tools <br /> proposed by the White House, such as America Fast Forward bond program or its Build America Bonds <br /> predecessor, which rely on unpredictable federal funding mechanisms to return subsidies to investors. <br /> By contrast, the federal tax exemption maintains a long history of reliability for investors, ensuring <br /> dependable returns, and consistently meeting our nation's infrastructure investment needs since the <br /> country's income tax code was promulgated in 1913. Through the tax-exemption, the federal <br /> government continues to provide critical support for the federal, state and local partnership that <br /> develops and maintains essential infrastructure, which it cannot practically replicate by other means. <br /> Proposals to reduce or repeal the tax exemption would have severely detrimental impacts on national <br /> infrastructure development and the municipal bond market, raising costs for state and local borrowers <br /> and creating uncertainty for investors. For example, it is estimated that if the proposal to cap the <br /> Page 1 of 2 <br />