AgdaPkt 2013-05-20 Closed Cancelled and Special

Browse Search

Atta 7.A. - Page 62 provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable costs to the local government of providing the service or product; (3) a charge imposed for the reasonable regulatory costs to a local government for issuing licenses and permits, performing investigations, inspections, and audits, enforcing agricultural marketing orders, and the administrative enforcement and adjudication thereof; (4) a charge imposed for entrance to or use of local government property, or the purchase,rental, or lease of local government property; (5) a fine, penalty, or other monetary charge imposed by the judicial branch of government or a local government, as a result of a violation of law; (6) a charge imposed as a condition of property development; and (7) assessments and property-related fees imposed in accordance with the provisions of Article XIII D." The local government bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that a levy,charge, or other exaction is not a tax,that the amount is no more than necessary to cover the reasonable costs of the governmental activity, and that the manner in which those costs are allocated to a payor bear a fair or reasonable relationship to the payor's burdens on, or benefits received from,the governmental activity. The foregoing discussion of Proposition 218 and Proposition 26 should not be considered an exhaustive or authoritative treatment of the provisions of such propositions or the possible effects of Proposition 218 and Proposition 26. Interim rulings, final decisions, legislative proposals and legislative enactments affecting Proposition 218 and Proposition 26 may impact the City's ability to make debt service payments on the Bonds. The City does not expect to be in a position to control the consideration or disposition of these issues and cannot predict the timing or outcome of any judicial or legislative activity related to these issues. Future Initiatives Articles XIIIC, XIIID and Proposition 26 were adopted as measures that qualified for the ballot pursuant to California's initiative process. From time to time other initiatives could be proposed and adopted affecting Net Revenues or the City's ability to increase its rates for water service. See "Proposition 218" above. The California constitution, Article XIIID, Section 5(c), specifically recognizes that any assessment existing on the effective date (of Article XIIID) shall be exempt from the procedures and approval process set forth in Article 4, to wit: "....(c) Any assessment the proceeds of which are exclusively used to repay bonded indebtedness of which the failure to pay would violate the Contract Impairment Clause of the Constitution of the United States." RISK FACTORS RELATING TO THE BONDS The following section describes certain special considerations and risk factors affecting the risk of nonpayment or the security for the Bonds. The following discussion is not meant to be an exhaustive or definitive description of the risks associated with a purchase of the Bonds and does not necessarily reflect the relative importance of the various risks. Potential investors are advised to consider the following special factors regarding the Bonds, together with all other information in this Official Statement, in order to make an informed investment decision with respect to the Bonds. There can be no assurance that other risk factors are not or will not become material in the future. General The payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds is secured solely by a pledge of Revenues, which is secured by a pledge by the City of the Net Revenues and certain funds under the Installment Purchase Contract. The realization of the Net Revenues is subject to, among other things,the capabilities of management of the City,the ability of the City to provide water services to its users, and the ability of the City to establish and maintain water fees and -39-