Laserfiche WebLink
(a) The opinion of Nossaman LLP, Irvine, California ("Bond Counsel"), approving <br /> the validity of the Bonds and stating that, subject to compliance by the Authority and the City <br /> with certain covenants, interest on the Bonds is excludable from gross income of the owners <br /> thereof for federal income tax purposes and is not included as an item of tax preference in <br /> computing the federal alternative minimum tax for individuals and corporations, but such <br /> interest is taken into account in computing an adjustment used in determining the federal <br /> alternative minimum tax for certain corporations and interest on the Bonds is exempt from <br /> personal income taxation imposed by the State of California. Other tax consequences to <br /> holders of the Bonds, if any, will not be addressed in the opinion; � <br /> (b) A certificate of the Authority certifying that on the basis of the facts, estimates <br /> and circumstances in existence on the date of issue, it is not expected that the proceeds of the <br /> Bonds will be used in a manner that would cause the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds; <br /> (c) A certificate of the Authority, signed by officers and representatives of the <br /> Authority, certifying that the officers and representatives have signed the Bonds whether by <br /> facsimile or manual signature, and that they were respectively duly authorized to execute the <br /> same; <br /> (d) The receipt of the Trustee evidencing the receipt of the purchase price of the <br /> Bonds; <br /> � (e) Certificates of the Authority and the City, certifying that there is no known <br /> litigation threatened or pending affecting the validity of the Bonds; <br /> (f) Certificates of the Authority and the City, signed by officers of the Authority and <br /> � the City, acting in their official capacity, to the effect that at the time of the sale of the Bonds, <br /> and at all times subsequent thereto up to and including the time of the delivery of the Bonds, <br /> the final official statement relating to the Bonds (the "Official Statement") did not contain any <br /> untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the <br /> statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; <br /> and <br /> (g) A negative assurance letter of C�uint&Thimmig LLP, San Francisc�, California <br /> ("Disclosure Counsel"), with respect to the Official Statement as described in "DISCLOSURE <br /> COUNSEL NEGATIVE ASSURANCE LETTER"below. <br /> CUSIP NUMBERS: ft is expected that the successful bidder will apply for CUSIP <br /> identification numbers for the Bonds and furnish such numbers to Bond Counsel and Disclosure <br /> Co.unsel. It is anticipated that CUSIP numbers will be printed on the Bonds, but neither the <br /> failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor error with respect thereto shall constitute cause <br /> for a failure or refusal by the purchaser thereof to accept delivery of and pay for the Bonds. All <br /> expenses in relation to the printing of CUSIP numbers on the Bonds shall be paid by the <br /> Authority, but the CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of such numbers shall be <br /> paid by the successful bidder. <br /> CERTIFICATION OF REOFFERING PRICE: The successful bidder shall be required, <br /> as a condition to the issuance of the Bonds, to deliver to the Authority a certificate, in form and <br /> substance satisfactory to Bond Counsel, stating (i) that, as of the date of award, all of the <br /> Bonds were expected to be reoffered in a bona fide public offering, (ii) as of the date of award, <br /> taking into account market conditions, the bidder had no reason to believe any of the Bonds <br /> would be initially sold to the general public at prices greater than the initial offering prices, (iii) <br /> -8- <br />