Minutes 1966 Jan to June - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Commission report read recommondi.ng approval subject to the i'nllow i ny cnnol ti ong : 1. Additional sewer laterals and/or grater services shall be installed at; no expense to the City. 2. The small shed shall he removed Prior to the issuance of a buildinr- permit for any of the parcels created. <. No building permit shall be _issued for construction on any of the newly created parcels prior to construction and final inspection of a double carport: or garage for exi.stV7 house which conforms with requirements of the Puildinq Code and the Zoning; Ordinance. 11. That no bui.ld07 permit shall be issued for construction on any of the newly created parcels prior to submission of proof that a parcel map has been recorded in accordance with the State Map Act. Staff analysts read. reported Subdivision Committee had recommended. ;rantin7 of the exception and approval of the subdivision subject to conditions now incorporated in Planning Commission's recommendation. Slid, shown o7:: the property illustrating posit ion cf the buildings presently on the site, exception required being only that area of two lots proposed have an area Of K,QOO so. ft., 1.00 so. ft. below the required 6,000 so. it. Councilman Rosselli asked whether one sewer lateral could be used to service these proposed lots in order to save on street disruption and was advised this was not possible, the two Parcels bein7 under separate ownership. Councilmen 7eckl.ey and Petersen expressed their concern on necessity of wantin7 variances on lots involv;in7 this small amount of footage from standard. size. Councilman Rosselli, asked if a. report could be made on number of substandard lots and if possible to amend ordinance to include these in soiTie manner so that these sliFht exceptions would not need to appear for Council action. Councilman Granger asked that report also include same information for remaining 29' lots. (demo 6/7/66) REPORT OF ETD OPTNTNG, Street Resurfacin7, 1966. The following bids were rete ved: Braga to Paving Co. $54, 14A . y0 K. C. Smith Co. Ft ?2! , 75 Douglas A Woodhouse KnFineer's Estimate City Manager reported in accordance with City's practi_ve of resurfacing a portion of City streets each construction year, funds were :included i.n the 1965-66 budget. He further advised it was Staff's original. -intent that at bast one full year would elapse after resurfacing before any trenching or street cuts would be made in con- n.ection with bond issue improvements but, since these projects have been accelerated this would not no- be possible. Ne further advised that if the streets on which ,00ry is to be done in connection with the bond issue were eliminated from the resur- facing schedule, the rnmaintnq work would amount to some 015,000. He further pni need out with this reduction from original engineer's estimate of $55,000 it, was now Evident that City is not in a. position to negotiate fo.r a reduced contract on the basis of prices bid. lie stated it was his recommendation that the bids be rejected, with an appropriate letter to the bidders concerned, explaining; the reason for rejection, recommending further that 05,000 of the $50,000 author. i_zed for street resurfacing in 1965-66 bud7ot be carried forward to accomplish necessary patching; on the streets which would have been resurfaced, and rema.i.ning 25,000 revert; to the General Fund.