Laserfiche WebLink
7.A. - Page 34 <br /> Summary of Impacts <br /> Potentially Less than Significant Less than <br /> Significant With Mitigation Significant No <br /> Im act Incor orated Im act Im act <br /> XIIL POPULATION AND HOUSING -- Would the project: <br /> a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, X <br /> by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through <br /> extension of roads or other infrastructure)? <br /> b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the X <br /> construction of replacement housing elsewhere? <br /> c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of X <br /> replacement housing elsewhere? <br /> Documentation <br /> a. Development within the DTPP area has already been contemplated in, and is consistent with, adopted plans <br /> (particularly the Redwood City General Plan) and the environmental documents prepared for those plans, and such <br /> development will not represent growth for which adequate planning has not occurred. No significant adverse <br /> growth-inducing impacts were anticipated from the DTPP or individual development projects occurring consistent <br /> with the DTPP. Moreover, the City's General Plan has identified the Downtown as an appropriate area of the city <br /> to accommodate future growth due to its walkable nature, transit access, and existing infrastructure. In addition, <br /> Downtown has been designated by the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) as a"Priority Development <br /> Area" and will be encouraged to accommodate growth as part of the regional Sustainable Communities Strategy for <br /> reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The proposed amendments would not result in arry new land uses that would <br /> require additional analysis and the project is in compliance with all applicable DTPP regulations, and as a result, <br /> no additional population/housing impacts are anticipated. <br /> b. & c. The DTPP EIR (pp. 5-8 through 5-10) concluded that the DTPP, and projects facilitated by it, would not result <br /> in significant displacement impacts. The project will not displace arry housing or residents. <br /> Summary of Impacts <br /> Potentially Less than Significant Less than <br /> Significant With Mitigation Significant No <br /> Im act Incor orated Im act Im act <br /> XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES -- Would the project: <br /> a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of <br /> new or physically altered governmental facilities or the need for new or <br /> physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could <br /> cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable <br /> service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the <br /> public services: <br /> Fire protection? X <br /> Police protection? X <br /> Schools? X <br /> Parks? X <br /> Solid waste? X <br /> Documentation <br /> a. Neither adoption of the proposed amendments, nor implementation of the proposed project will result in substantial <br /> physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities or the need for a <br /> new or physically altered governmental facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or <br /> other performance objectives beyond those identified in the DTPP EIR (pp. 8-1 through 8-21). In addition, the <br /> 25 <br />