AgdaPkt 2013-07-22 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

8.A. - Page 3 A critical feature of the Public Arts Master Plan is the review and approval process for accepting public art. The Plan defines the roles of the City Council, the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department, the Civic Cultural Commission and the Public Art Task Force. The following flow chart provides a visual description of the initial intake of a public art proposal by the Civic Cultural Commission, the review by the Commission's Public Art Subcommittee, feedback and advice from the Public Art Task Force, Commission recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council, and ultimately formal review and adoption by the City Council. � Flow Chart 1. Civic Cultural Commission receives public art project or proposal 4. Based on feedback from the 2. Civic Cultural Commission Public Art public Art Task Force, the Civic Subcommittee provides initial review of Cultural Commission recommends proposed public art project projects to Planning Commission and to City Council 3. Public Art Task Force reviews proposed public art project and provides feedback to the Civic Cultural Commission 5. City Council receives 6. If project is approved by recommendation the City Council, the project is then managed by appropriate department ALTERNATIVES The Council could ask the Public Arts Task Force to make further revisions to the Public Arts Master Plan and return for possible approval. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact as a result of the Public Arts Master Plan. Currently, the City Council appropriates $58,000 from the General Fund to the Civic Cultural Commission to support non-profit organizations through a formal grant process each year. The Commission typically appropriates a small portion of this funding towards public art projects. The largest funding source for public art is the GR Cress