CC Min 2013-04-08 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

approach that both sides took, but brought up several points that she would like to be addressed: understanding better the mitigations that would have been required as a result of the EIR (Environmental Impact Report) as opposed to the different support for infrastructure that Stanford will be providing; recycled water; and, contributions for sidewalk improvements and streets. Furthermore, she was hoping for a longer term commitment on the issue of education. She applauded the graduate school programs, but was looking for longer term commitment with the Education Foundation. She reasoned that the need to help with elementary schools is greater. Otherwise, she recognized the intricacies of this development, and so appreciates the work done to date. Vice Mayor Gee thanked the Subcommittee and Stanford. He acknowledged that this was a long journey and there were a lot of details. He further stated that these are multigenerational projects for residents, that the clarity of documents will be in the details, and that the future will reveal if they have been consistent with the Guiding Principles. He also acknowledged the importance and uniqueness of community partnerships, such as the Friendly Acres Neighborhood, YMCA, Education Foundation, and Community Events. Mayor Aguirre thanked Mr. Ekern, Stanford, the community, everyone involved, and her colleagues. She stated that she had hoped before that Stanford would be visible in the community, and she felt they have been. She said that the benefits from this development would spread beyond Redwood City and Palo Alto. She further mentioned that as she sees things regionally, these partnerships, business and education, are models for other cities. The Mayor also said she was excited about the benefits to the children and education. City Manager Bell followed up with the next steps for moving forward. He would like to circle back with the Subcommittee, close the loop with Stanford. He also mentioned that this will go to the Planning Commission and then to the Council. Mr. Ekern additionally stated that he would like to get this information to the Planning Commission in late May or June, and then to bring it back to Council in the following months. Dr. Bell said that they would try to get this to Council in one of the summer Council meetings. 9. STAFF REPORT(S) A. Housing Element 2012 Annual Progress Update (601) Recommendation: Consider the Housing Element 2012 Annual Progress Report before sending the report to the Department of Housing and Community Development. Maureen Riordan, Senior Planner, discussed the progress made so far this year. She spoke about the Housing Element background; its importance, such as being a qualifying for grants; and six basic housing element requirements. Ms. Riordan mentioned that Department of Housing and Community Development, determines what CITY COUNCIL April 8, 2013 MEETING MINUTES PAGE 10 MINUTE BOOK NO. 64 Page No. 324