My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
RDA Min 2001-01-08 Jnt
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
Redevelopment
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
RDA Min 2001-01-08 Jnt
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:42:09 PM
Creation date
3/29/2004 9:36:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
Redevelopment
Date
1/8/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />-- - ---- <br />The department was contacted and is responsible for the maintenance of the parking <br />structure. The costs were actually those used for the parking structure on Marshall <br />Street. City Manager clarified that the $1,500.00 per year is for elevator maintenance <br />only and $42,000.00 for other maintenance. Roberta Mundie, of Mundie and <br />Associates, reported the costs are actually estimated much higher at approximately <br />$200,000.00 per year. <br />Joe Syufy, Century Theatres, responded to the following question. <br />25. A request to break out the demographics into age groups was requested. <br />Mr. Syufy apologized stating that data of that nature is not collected. The only data <br />collected pertains to ticket prices, that being how many child, adult or senior tickets are <br />sold. He stated 5-6% of tickets sold are to children (12 and under), the same to seniors <br />and the balance to adults. Bargain matinees are not included because the ticket prices <br />are all the same. <br />Tim Kelly, of Keyser Marston Associates, responded to one comment. <br />26. The City is giving land to the developer in exchange for a garage estimated to cost <br />$20,000,000.00, which will generate revenue of $220,100.00 a year. This is slightly <br />better than a 1 % return on investment per year to the City, hardly a good deal. <br />He stated the comment is not based upon a correct interpretation of the proposed <br />agreement which is that the $20,000,000.00 is not a City or Agency expense. It is an <br />expense being funded by the private developer; however, the City/Agency will own the <br />garage. The cost to the Agency to get the $20,000,000.00 from the developer is that of <br />conveying two parcels of substantially less value, approximately one quarter less ofthe <br />value. The cost to the Agency is substantially less than $20,000,000.00. The return to <br />the Agency, the $220,000.00, is partly reflective of the City's policy towards parking <br />charges. <br />Roberta Mundie, Mundie and Associates, the consultant that prepared the economic report <br />for the retail/cinema proposal responded to the following questions. <br />27. The continuing success ofthe other cinema projects studied in the economic <br />report was questioned. <br />The economic report discusses the number of cinema projects in other communities' <br />downtowns and reviews their record. As the report mentions, the original research for <br />those reviews was undertaken some time ago, but this fall was updated again with staff <br />and/or project representatives in each one of the cities of Berkeley, Oakland, Concord, <br />JOINT ADJOURNED REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 8, 2001 <br />MINUTES PAGE 12 <br /> MINUTES Book No.58 <br /> Page NO. 308 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.