Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> -- <br />final plans. The traffic concerns can be dealt with now by exploring other routes and that <br />because there are concerns does not mean it is not an appropriate project. <br />Council Member Howard stated she supports the retail/cinema project and that it is the best <br />available solution in the revitalization of the downtown. Concerns ftom the public have <br />been heard regarding safety, esthetics, parking and best use of the property, and she <br />promised the Council would be diligent in following up on the concerns. Monitoring and <br />mitigation will continue throughout and beyond the planning and building process. She <br />stated the vision is for this project to be the heart of downtown. <br />Council Member Jordan clarified that her opposition to the interim urgency ordinance <br />concerned private property owners. She further stated that she believes if the project goes <br />through that there are enough people watching it to ensure that architecturally it will look <br />good. <br />Mayor Ruskin stated that after such an extraordinary economy the downtown is still <br />sleepy. He further stated his conclusion that a project with enough impact must be brought <br />in to fully revitalize the downtown. The cinema has the potential to bring thousands of <br />people to the downtown resulting in the retail stores on the ground floor having foot traffic. <br />Much has been said about the cinema industry and he is convinced that the Syufy cinema <br />company is very strong. The second major reason for the project is that this will involve no <br />public funds. The third key reason is traffic. The traffic coming to the attraction will be <br />moving in the opposite direction of commute traffic. He stated he tested the traffic flow <br />from Veterans Boulevard down every route possible toward the proposed site and <br />discovered both plentiful routes and emptiness of roads. He also tested the proposed <br />parking areas and found plentiful parking available not to mention public transportation. <br />He stated there are concerns that downtown Redwood City may have a "cookie cutter" <br />project. He stated that we must ensure that the project has exemplary architecture, design <br />and signage; and the Architecture Review Committee is committed to this and Council has <br />final approval. Although safety is a concern, he stated the critical issue to be the mix of <br />retail. He stated his concern for seniors and transportation may be addressed by use of <br />shuttles. The Police Department states there is not an issue ensuring safety in the area. He <br />stated that for all the above reasons he would be supporting the resolution. <br />MIS Hartnett/Claire to approve the following amendments to the DDA: <br />1. In the first paragraph of Section 501, sixth line, the word "substantially" shall <br /> be inserted between the words "excellence" and "consistent". <br />2. In the last line of the second paragraph of Section 501, the word "reasonable" <br /> shall be deleted. <br />3. The following new paragraphs shall be added at the end of Section 50 I; <br />REGULAR COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT MEETINGS JANUARY 29, 2001 <br />MINUTES PAGE 10 <br /> MINUTES Book No.58 <br /> Page NO. 339 <br />