Laserfiche WebLink
Facts in Support of Finding: Implementatian of Mitigation 15-5 tivould reduce potential <br /> expansive soifs impacts to a less-than-signifrca�t level by requiring detailed, site- <br /> specific geotechnica! inves#igations and solutions prepared by a registered <br /> engineering gealogist or geotechn+cal engineer, with revfew ar�d appro�al <br /> authority by the City Engineer. These facts are described in Draft �fR chapter 15 <br /> (Geology and Soils) on pages 15-1 through 15-15, which is hereby incorporated <br /> by reference. <br /> Impact: Impact 15-6: 5eismically Induced Settlement. Development of the proposed <br /> project would place new cammercial buildings in an area tf�at could experience <br /> rapid, excessi�e settlement in respanse ta earth�uake-induced ground shaking <br /> during the useful life of tf�e project impra�ements. <br /> MitigatEon: Mitigation 15-6. The detailed, design-le�el geotechnical in�estigations required <br /> under Mitigafion 15-9 for each project construction phase shall include a site- <br /> specific erraluation of the liquefaction and settlement potential at each proposed <br /> building Iocation. The in�estigations shall also propose measures as needed #o <br /> offset the eff�cts af liquefaction-induced settlement, either through stabilization of <br /> the most �ulnerable sand layers or through utilization of building foundation, <br /> utility connectian, and pa�ement designs that can withstand the anticipated <br /> degree of total and differential settlement. <br /> Finding: implementation of Mitigation 'I5-6 would rsduce these potential seismically <br /> induced settlement impacts to a less-than-significant level. <br /> Facts in Support of Finding: Impfementation of Mitigation 15-8 would reduce �otential <br /> seismically induced settlement impacts to a less-than-sign�cant level by <br /> requiring detailed, site-specific geotechnical investigations and solutians <br /> preparec! by a registered engineering geolagist or geotechnicai engineer, with <br /> review and approval authority by the City Engineer. These facts are described in <br /> Draft ERR chapter 15 (Gealogy and 5oils) on pages 15-1 through 15-15, which is <br /> hereby incarporated by reference. <br /> Hazards and Hazardous Mater�als <br /> Impact: Impact 92-9: Patentlal project-Related Exposure to Existing 5oil or <br /> Groundwater Contamination. Project-related excavafion and construc#ian <br /> activities, as wel! as project o�eratians, cauld expose on-site construction and <br /> maintenancs persannel and members of the public ta existing soil and <br /> groundwa#er contamination. Recammendations included in the August 2008 <br /> draft Si#e Management Plan (SMP) commissioned by Stanford University for the <br /> 5tanford development portion of the Precise Plan area identify the en�ironmental <br /> issues associated with �roject de�elopment site construction acti�ities (e.g., <br /> exca�ation, dewatering, etc.) and specify the contents of the site-specifc, <br /> construction period Health and Safety f'lan {HASP} that the construction <br /> contractor must prepare {a standard CaIOSHA requirement for work at <br /> hazardous waste sites). <br /> ATTY/RE50.2898/PC RE50 RECQMMENDING STANFORD EIR CERTIFICATION <br /> REV:0$-15-13 VR <br /> Page 21 of 5fi <br />