My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2013-09-09
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
AgdaPkt 2013-09-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2013 11:04:42 AM
Creation date
9/5/2013 5:04:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/9/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
404
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
a,7.A. - Page 25 <br /> Resources, a local register of historical resources, or a historical resources <br /> survey. Due to the conflicting opinions on the historical significance of the three <br /> structures and the fact that the City had not made a final determination as to <br /> whether these structures should be included on its historical resources register, <br /> the City treated the 425 Broadway building, the plaza area with the Warnecke <br /> Fountains, and the Ampex sign as potential historic resources for the purposes of <br /> the Draft EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15064.5(a)(4). <br /> The demolition of these structures would constitute a substantial adverse change <br /> in the significance of potential historic resources, and also contribute to <br /> cumulative impacts on historic resources. <br /> Mitigation: Mitigation 14-1. The project shall incorporate design elements within the <br /> publicly accessible areas of the project that point to the various important periods <br /> of land use on the site (farming, flower fields, airfield, and center for technology <br /> innovation). The applicant has agreed to incorporate these elements regardless <br /> of whether the City ultimately determines that the proposed project would cause <br /> a significant impact on historic resources, and these elements are included in the <br /> Draft Stanford in Redwood Citv Precise Plan. <br /> Any structure on the project development site that the City determines is a local <br /> historic resource shall be photographed and documented prior to demolition or <br /> removal. The documentation shall adhere to the Secretary of the Interior's <br /> Standards for Architectural and Engineering Documentation. The level of <br /> documentation shall be proportionate with the level of significance of the <br /> resource. The documentation shall be made available for inclusion in the Historic <br /> American Building Survey (HABS) or the Historic American Engineering Record <br /> (HAER) Collections in the Library of Congress, the California Historical <br /> Resources Information System and the Bancroft Library, as well as local libraries <br /> and historical societies, such as the Redwood City Public Library. <br /> Through careful methods of planned deconstruction to avoid damage and loss, <br /> identified historic character-defining features and materials shall be salvaged as <br /> feasible for educational and interpretive use on-site, or for reuse in new <br /> construction on the development site in a way that commemorates their original <br /> use and significance. <br /> Finding: Implementation of Mitigation 14-1 (commemoration and documentation of 425 <br /> Broadway and the plaza area with the Warnecke fountains, and relocating the <br /> Ampex sign, if they are determined to be historic resources) would not be <br /> sufficient to mitigate project and cumulative impacts on historic resources to a <br /> less-than-significant level, and therefore the impacts would be considered <br /> significant and unavoidable. <br /> Facts in Support of Finding: The City, as to the historical significance of the 425 Broadway <br /> building, the plaza area with the Warnecke Fountains, and the Ampex sign, has <br /> determined that these structures are designated historic resources. Therefore, <br /> implementation of Mitigation 14-1 would reduce project and cumulative impacts <br /> on these historic resources, but not to less-than-significant levels, resulting in <br /> significant unavoidable impacts. Implementation of project alternative 18.3 <br /> ATTY/RES0.2901/STANFORD EIR CERTIFICATION <br /> REV:08-29-13 VR <br /> Page 15 of 56 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.