My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2013-09-09
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
AgdaPkt 2013-09-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2013 11:04:42 AM
Creation date
9/5/2013 5:04:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/9/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
404
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
a,7.A. - Page 35 <br /> and providing construction schedule notices; the Noise Disturbance Coordinator would <br /> work directly with an assigned City staff inember. Alternatively, the Noise Disturbance <br /> Coordinator could be employed by the City and funded by the applicant.) <br /> ■ Temporary Closure or Relocation of Child Care Center. If the project construction <br /> sequencing results in major outdoor construction activities occurring adjacent to the child <br /> care center after it is in operation, then the project sponsor, at its option, shall either <br /> temporarily close or relocate the child care center. <br /> Finding: Implementation of Mitigation 13-2 would reduce construction noise impacts, but <br /> because this project likely would be constructed in phases over a long period of <br /> time, nearby sensitive receptors would be subjected to repeated construction <br /> noise, thereby resulting in a significant unavoidable construction noise <br /> impact. <br /> Facts in Support of Finding: Implementation of Mitigation 13-2 would reduce project- <br /> facilitated demolition and construction noise to the maximum extent feasible by <br /> requiring rigorous, coordinated procedures, scheduling, and equipment <br /> standards. However, because the project is likely to be constructed in phases <br /> over several years, this intermittent noise impact on nearby sensitive receptors <br /> (e.g., residences) is considered significant and unavoidable. These facts are <br /> described and quantified in Draft EIR chapter 13 (Noise) on pages 13-1 through <br /> 13-20, which is hereby incorporated by reference. <br /> Impact: Impact 13-3: Project-Facilitated Groundborne Vibration Levels. Project- <br /> facilitated demolition and construction activities could generate substantial <br /> vibration (e.g., from potential pile driving) in the project vicinity. <br /> Mitigation: Mitigation 13-3. Reduce groundborne vibration levels during individual, location- <br /> specific future project demolition and construction periods by incorporating <br /> conditions in individual project demolition and construction contractor <br /> agreements that stipulate the following groundborne vibration abatement <br /> measures: <br /> ■ Restrict vibration-generating activity to between the hours of 7:00 AM and <br /> 7:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Prohibit such activity on weekends and <br /> holidays. <br /> ■ If pile driving is proposed, prepare a vibration study. If the vibration study <br /> shows that pile driving, including mitigation such as pre-drilling of pile holes, <br /> would cause vibration exceeding 0.5 inches/sec ppv for structurally sound <br /> buildings designed to modern engineering standards or 0.2 inches/sec for <br /> structurally sound buildings for which structural damage is a major concern, <br /> then pile driving shall not be conducted. <br /> Finding: Implementation of Mitigation 13-3 would reduce this potential intermittent and <br /> short-term project vibration impact to a less-than-significant level. <br /> ATTY/RES0.2901/STANFORD EIR CERTIFICATION <br /> REV:08-29-13 VR <br /> Page 25 of 56 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.