My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2013-09-09
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
AgdaPkt 2013-09-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2013 11:04:42 AM
Creation date
9/5/2013 5:04:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/9/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
404
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.A. - Page 40 ATfACHMENT 1 <br /> pages 7-1 through 7-70, Draft EIR appendix 21.3 (Supplemental Transportation <br /> Information), and Final EIR appendix A (Supplemental Traffic Information), which <br /> are hereby incorporated by reference. <br /> Impact: Impact 7-5: Near Term Plus Project Impact on Woodside Road/Broadway <br /> Intersection. Under Near Term Plus Project conditions during the PM peak <br /> hour, this intersection would continue to operate at LOS F, and project traffic <br /> would cause the critical delay to increase by 69.5 seconds. <br /> Mitigation: Mitigation 7-5. Implement Mitigation 7-1 (the project applicant would be <br /> responsible for fully funding/completing the mitigation). With these improvements, <br /> the level of service (LOS) at this intersection would remain at LOS F. Although <br /> the LOS F condition would exceed the City LOS standard, the LOS under Near <br /> Term Plus Project condition with this mitigation would be better than that under <br /> the Near Term Without Project condition. These improvements would enhance <br /> the overall performance of the intersection. <br /> Finding: Implementation of Mitigation 7-5 would reduce this project impact to a less-than- <br /> significant level. However, because implementation of this mitigation would <br /> require Caltrans approval, the City cannot ensure its construction. Without <br /> implementation of the proposed mitigation, the impact would be significant and <br /> unavoidable. <br /> Facts in Support of Finding: Implementation of Mitigation 7-5 would reduce the project's <br /> traffic impact at the Woodside Road/Broadway intersection to a less-than- <br /> significant level through a combination of roadway restriping, signage, modified <br /> traffic signal phasing, and based on Caltrans directives, possibly pedestrian <br /> count-down signals, an emergency vehicle pre-emption system, new corner radii <br /> to reduce pedestrian crossing distances, pedestrian median refuges, bike lanes, <br /> and bike detectors. However, the City cannot guarantee in advance that Caltrans <br /> will approve the mitigation, so the impact is currently considered significant and <br /> unavoidable. These facts are described in Draft EIR chapter 7 (Transportation, <br /> Circulation, and Parking) on pages 7-1 through 7-70, Draft EIR appendix 21.3 <br /> (Supplemental Transportation Information), and Final EIR appendix A <br /> (Supplemental Traffic Information), which are hereby incorporated by reference. <br /> Impact: Impact 7-6: Near Term Plus Project Impact on Woodside Road/Bay Road <br /> Intersection. Under Near Term Plus Project conditions during the PM peak <br /> hour, project traffic would cause this intersection to degrade from LOS D (44.9 <br /> seconds delay) to LOS F (91.1 seconds delay). <br /> Mitigation: Mitigation 7-6. Implement Mitigation 7-2 (the project applicant would be <br /> responsible for fully funding/completing the mitigation). <br /> Finding: Implementation of Mitigation 7-6 would improve the level of service (LOS) at this <br /> intersection to an acceptable LOS D in the PM peak hour, resulting in a /ess- <br /> than-significant impact. However, because implementation of this mitigation <br /> would require Caltrans approval, the City cannot ensure its construction. Without <br /> implementation of the proposed mitigation, the impact would be significant and <br /> unavoidable. <br /> ATTY/RES0.2901/STANFORD EIR CERTIFICATION <br /> REV:08-29-13 VR <br /> Page 30 of 56 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.