Laserfiche WebLink
7.A. - Page 50 ATfACHMENT 1 <br /> Finding: The proposed project's payment of its fair share toward the necessary <br /> improvements identified in Mitigation 7-16 would mitigate the project's <br /> contribution to the cumulative impact to a less-than-significant level. <br /> Facts in Support of Finding: Implementation of Mitigation 7-16 would reduce the project's <br /> contribution to the cumulative traffic impact at the Douglas Avenue/Middlefield <br /> Road intersection to a less-than-significant level through the project's payment of <br /> its fair share (estimated to be 23 percent) to a mitigation fund, or if in effect at <br /> building permit issuance, through payment of its City Traffic Impact Fee, to <br /> modify the signal phasing at the intersection. These facts are described in Draft <br /> EI R chapter 7 (Transportation, Circulation, and Parking) on pages 7-1 through 7- <br /> 70, Draft EIR appendix 21.3 (Supplemental Transportation Information), and <br /> Final EIR appendix A (Supplemental Traffic Information), which are hereby <br /> incorporated by reference. <br /> Impact: Impact 7-17: Cumulative With Project Impact on 2nd Avenue/Broadway <br /> Intersection. Under Cumulative With Project conditions during the AM peak <br /> hour, the intersection would remain at LOS F, and the proposed project could <br /> contribute up to 6.7 seconds of critical delay to the intersection. <br /> Mitigation: Mitigation 7-17. To mitigate the significant cumulative impact at the intersection <br /> of 2nd Avenue and Broadway, the intersection would need to be signalized. With <br /> this improvement, the level of service (LOS) at this intersection would improve to <br /> acceptable LOS C during the AM peak hour. <br /> Traffic from the proposed project could add up to 6.7 seconds to the AM peak <br /> hour delay at this intersection over Cumulative No Project conditions (see Draft <br /> EI R Table 7.16); other Cumulative growth could add up to 89.8 seconds to the <br /> delay over Near Term No Project conditions. The proposed project would <br /> contribute its fair share to a mitigation fund established to pay for the cost of this <br /> improvement (estimated, based on the Draft EIR, to be 7 percent) at the time of <br /> issuance of a building permit or, if the City adds the improvement to its Traffic <br /> Impact Fee Program (TIF) project list, the proposed project would pay its Traffic <br /> Impact Fee in effect at time of payment and issuance of a building permit. <br /> Finding: The proposed project's payment of its fair share toward the necessary <br /> improvements identified in Mitigation 7-17 would mitigate the project's <br /> contribution to the cumulative impact to a less-than-significant level. <br /> Facts in Support of Finding: Implementation of Mitigation 7-17 would reduce the project's <br /> contribution to the cumulative traffic impact at the 2�d Avenue/Broadway <br /> intersection to a less-than-significant level through the project's payment of its <br /> fair share (estimated to be 7 percent) to a mitigation fund, or if in effect at building <br /> permit issuance, through payment of its City Traffic Impact Fee, to signalize the <br /> intersection. These facts are described in Draft EIR chapter 7 (Transportation, <br /> Circulation, and Parking) on pages 7-1 through 7-70, Draft EIR appendix 21.3 <br /> (Supplemental Transportation Information), and Final EIR appendix A <br /> (Supplemental Traffic Information), which are hereby incorporated by reference. <br /> ATTY/RES0.2901/STANFORD EIR CERTIFICATION <br /> REV:08-29-13 VR <br /> Page 40 of 56 <br />