My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2013-09-09
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
AgdaPkt 2013-09-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2013 11:04:42 AM
Creation date
9/5/2013 5:04:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/9/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
404
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
a,7.A. - Page 73 <br /> the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. In addition, with respect to the <br /> mitigation measures, the Planning Commission finds that: <br /> (a) Some of the intersection mitigation measures included in the <br /> Mitigation Monitoring Program cannot be implemented absent the approval of <br /> other agencies in addition to the City. These mitigation measures and the other <br /> agencies whose approvals are required are: (1) Mitigation 7-1 and 7-5 <br /> (Woodside Road/Broadway Intersection): Caltrans; (2) Mitigation 7-2, 7-6 and 7- <br /> 13 (Woodside Road/Bay Road Intersection): Caltrans; (3) Mitigation 7-12 <br /> (Veterans Blvd./Woodside Road Intersection): Caltrans; (4) Mitigation 7-14 <br /> (Woodside Road/Middlefield Road Intersection): Caltrans; and (5) Mitigation 7-18 <br /> (Marsh Road/Scott Drive Intersection): City of Menlo Park. The Planning <br /> Commission hereby finds that these mitigation measures are partly within the <br /> jurisdiction of other public agencies and can and should be approved by those <br /> other agencies. If any of these mitigation measures is not approved by the other <br /> agency listed, that mitigation measure will be infeasible. <br /> (b) The Draft EIR identified one potential mitigation measure that is <br /> infeasible, as follows: Mitigation 7-11 and 7-19 - Widening of US 101 to add <br /> mixed flow lane. The Planning Commission finds that this mitigation measure is <br /> infeasible because, although the US 101 segments near the Project site currently <br /> operate at levels of service E and F, Caltrans, which has jurisdiction over <br /> improvements to US 101, has no plans to widen the affected freeway segments <br /> due to right of way limitations. <br /> 12. The City Council directs the City's Community Development Department <br /> to file a notice of determination with the County Clerk of San Mateo County upon <br /> approval of the Project. <br /> 13. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15091(e), the documents and other <br /> materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning <br /> Commission has based its recommendations are located in and may be obtained from, <br /> the Office of the City Clerk at 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, California. The City <br /> Clerk is the custodian of records for all matters before the City. <br /> 14. This Resolution is effective upon its adoption. <br /> * * * <br /> ATTY/RES0.2901/STANFORD EIR CERTIFICATION <br /> REV:08-29-13 VR <br /> Page 7 of 55 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.