Laserfiche WebLink
09/09/2013 <br /> require the removal of 15 parking spaces from Douglas Avenue. These facts are <br /> described in Draft EIR chapter 7 (Transportation, Circulation, and Parking) on <br /> pages 7-1 through 7-70, Draft EIR appendix 21.3 (Supplemental Transportation <br /> Information), and Final EIR appendix A (Supplemental Traffic Information), which <br /> are hereby incorporated by reference. <br /> Impact: Impact 7-10: Near Term Plus Project Impact on 5th Avenue/Bay Road <br /> Intersection. Under Near Term Plus Project conditions during the PM peak hour, <br /> project traffic would cause the intersection to degrade from LOS C (21.8 seconds <br /> delay) to LOS E (38.4 seconds delay). In addition, this intersection would have <br /> peak hour volume increases large enough under both peak hours to satisfy the <br /> peak hour signal warrant. <br /> Mitigation: Mitigation 7-10(a). The signalization of the 5th Avenue/Bay Road intersection is <br /> a transportation project included in the City's 2000 Traffic Impact Fee Program <br /> (TIF). Payment by the project applicant of its City Traffic Impact Fee in effect at <br /> time of payment and issuance of a building permit (or alternatively applicant's full <br /> funding or construction of the improvement, subject to potential reimbursement <br /> as provided in the Precise Plan) would mitigate this impact. To mitigate the <br /> project's impact at the intersection of 5th Avenue and Bay Road, the intersection <br /> would need to be signalized. (5th Avenue is considered north-south and Bay <br /> Road is considered east-west.) No further improvements would be required. <br /> or <br /> Mitigation 7-10(b). Mitigation of the project's impact at the intersection of 5th <br /> Avenue and Bay Road would require the conversion of the all-way stop <br /> controlled intersection to a single lane roundabout. The existing road widths at <br /> 5th Avenue and Bay Road would allow up to an 85-foot-diameter roundabout. If <br /> the design work shows that the 85-foot-diameter roundabout would not require <br /> the acquisition of additional right-of-way and would not create additional safety <br /> hazards for motorists, pedestrians, or bicyclists compared to Mitigation 7-10(a), <br /> and if substantial evidence at the time the roundabout is proposed shows that the <br /> roundabout would not divert traffic to other intersections, the roundabout shall be <br /> considered feasible and may be substituted for Mitigation 7-10(a). <br /> Finding: Implementation of Mitigation 7-10(a) would improve the level of service (LOS) at <br /> this intersection to an acceptable LOS B during both peak hours, resulting in a <br /> less-than-significant impact. <br /> or <br /> Implementation of Mitigation 7-10(b) would improve the level of service (LOS) at <br /> this intersection to an acceptable LOS A during both peak hours, resulting in a <br /> less-than-significant impact. <br /> Facts in Support of Finding: Implementation of either option for Mitigation 7-10 would reduce <br /> the project's traffic impact at the 5th Avenue/Bay Road intersection to a less-than- <br /> significant level. Mitigation option 7-10(a) requires the project's payment of its <br /> City Traffic Impact Fee to help fund signalization of the intersection (to replace <br /> the current Stop signs). Mitigation option 7-10(b) requires the design and <br /> ATTY/RES0.2901/STANFORD EIR CERTIFICATION RESO.#15294 <br /> REV:09-10-13 VR MUFF#100 <br /> Page 33 of 55 <br />