Res13 15294 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

09/09/2013 Finding: The proposed project's payment of its fair share toward the necessary improvements identified in Mitigation 7-16 would mitigate the projecYs contribution to the cumulative impact to a less-than-significant level. Facts in Support of Finding: Implementation of Mitigation 7-16 would reduce the project's contribution to the cumulative traffic impact at the Douglas Avenue/Middlefield Road intersection to a less-than-significant level through the projecYs payment of its fair share (estimated to be 23 percent) to a mitigation fund, or if in effect at building permit issuance, through payment of its City Traffic Impact Fee, to modify the signal phasing at the intersection. These facts are described in Draft EIR chapter 7 (Transportation, Circulation, and Parking) on pages 7-1 through 7- 70, Draft EIR appendix 21.3 (Supplemental Transportation Information), and Final EIR appendix A (Supplemental Traffic Information), which are hereby incorporated by reference. Impact: Impact 7-17: Cumulative With Project Impact on 2nd Avenue/Broadway Intersection. Under Cumulative With Project conditions during the AM peak hour, the intersection would remain at LOS F, and the proposed project could contribute up to 6.7 seconds of critical delay to the intersection. Mitigation: Mitigation 7-17. To mitigate the significant cumulative impact at the intersection of 2nd Avenue and Broadway, the intersection would need to be signalized. With this improvement, the level of service (LOS) at this intersection would improve to acceptable LOS C during the AM peak hour. Traffic from the proposed project could add up to 6.7 seconds to the AM peak hour delay at this intersection over Cumulative No Project conditions (see Draft EIR Table 7.16); other Cumulative growth could add up to 89.8 seconds to the delay over Near Term No Project conditions. The proposed project would contribute its fair share to a mitigation fund established to pay for the cost of this improvement (estimated, based on the Draft EIR, to be 7 percent) at the time of issuance of a building permit or, if the City adds the improvement to its Traffic Impact Fee Program (TIF) project list, the proposed project would pay its Traffic Impact Fee in effect at time of payment and issuance of a building permit. Finding: The proposed project's payment of its fair share toward the necessary improvements identified in Mitigation 7-17 would mitigate the project's contribution to the cumulative impact to a less-than-significant level. Facts in Support of Finding: Implementation of Mitigation 7-17 would reduce the project's contribution to the cumulative traffic impact at the 2"d Avenue/Broadway intersection to a less-than-significant level through the projecYs payment of its fair share (estimated to be 7 percent) to a mitigation fund, or if in effect at building permit issuance, through payment of its City Traffic Impact Fee, to signalize the intersection. These facts are described in Draft EIR chapter 7 (Transportation, Circulation, and Parking) on pages 7-1 through 7-70, Draft EIR appendix 21.3 (Supplemental Transportation Information), and Final EIR appendix A (Supplemental Traffic Information), which are hereby incorporated by reference. ATTY/RES0.2901/STANFORD EIR CERTIFICATION RESO.#15294 REV:09-10-13 VR MUFF#100 Page 39 of 55