Laserfiche WebLink
Al <br />8.A. - Page 296 <br />8.A. - Page 54 <br />TO: City Council of Redwood City <br />FR: Couoer ned Nefglibors of Proposed Laurel Way Planned Development Project <br />RE. Appeal of the Redwood City Planning Commission's C%tificadon of the FhW <br />M Adoption of Cortam Findings Concemag Mit pbou Meegures, and <br />Adoption of litigation Monitmring and Reporting Program for the Lsurral Way <br />Planned Developanent Project <br />DATE, August 31, 2010 <br />Dear Mr. Mayor. Madam Deputy Mayor and Members of the City Council; <br />In accordance with Article 48 of the Redwood City Zoiiag Ordinance, we. the undersigned, <br />reslnO�ulip request the City, Council overt= the decision of the ?kmnWg Commission on <br />August 24, 2010, certifyitlg an Envira=wa ai hnpwt Report on the Laurel Way Planned <br />Development Project, Making Ccataiu Findings Conom ring N,Btigatioin Measures, and Adopting <br />a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Progmm Oaap). r We believe that the Final <br />Eb*o=wtal impact Repan <br />Wk to address several critical impacts on the lumKofore undeveloped <br />pro.led <br />fails to find significant environmental impact where such impact is <br />supported by substantial evidence; and <br />adopts inadequate. mitigation measums to couatcract such impacts, as <br />applicable. <br />As such, the FBIR fails to mark California EnvironmenW Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. <br />Given the e.xttemrly short tirwrwe of seven (7) days in which to file an appeal, appellwts would <br />appreciate the Council's consideration of this letter as a general summary of our appeal and we <br />reserve the eight to supplement this appeal with additional materials within the time period <br />allowed. <br />1 tU Commissiam's accampoayNx Resolution aisa mates that the Cw n bsiom .rade PlndiW conca:afng Project <br />alternatives, However, insofar as the Commission bseed findmga that no s4pifi ant kmpact world rank from the <br />pzojaot as proposed, the Commission specifically conelu&d that it need not make airy 5ndiw rsgardimg etre <br />fieISMiity or dedubility of any of dw ab =add WenOW end ndywd it rho FM. As dam9nd hovel% this <br />Via) problmn for the Commission in analyzing xW Nmwd DmIopmew Fumit WHc anon for <br />