Laserfiche WebLink
8.A. - Page 385 <br />8.A. - Page 143 <br />build a really big house on a large steep slope. Also the discussion of this alternative at <br />the end ofDEIR states that the applicant amid so build 18 homes with merged lob, <br />which doesn't, makes aense. Logically it seems that no matter how you combine lots <br />with a >30 % slope; that those should not be built on based on cwt RH zoaft and if <br />you merge the 41ats that are substandard and have a slope of less *an 30* than you <br />might get 2 house out of this project. <br />The rialm of building this project in an cateSMas eves with the proposed miflpfion <br />me alums seams to far oufisne o any risk #bat might occur imm no dcvelopmmt. <br />I see no environmei. or firncdon desirability of this prgect nor does it fit to duzac ter <br />Of the surrounding neighborhood. It does not seem f+eaffile how Redwood City could <br />preserve the visual qualities of our am by allowing the building of a project of this <br />magnitude and it would definitely look out of piece in our neighborhood. I hope both the <br />Planning Commission and Cmmcil strongly consider the many ootnacmb and opinions of <br />the Individuals that surround this proposed projcct and are sensW-vet3o our ooncerns about <br />how are quality of life will be impacted by such a development, <br />Sincor y, <br />KrisEi and Rich Gumon <br />3666 Glenwood Ave. <br />Redwood City, CA 94062 <br />