Laserfiche WebLink
After the allegations of embezzlement, some of the Trustees determined the Manager's skills <br />were inadequate for the position! The Board hired an outside consultant to perform a review of <br />the internal financial controls. Notwithstanding this state of affairs, the Trustees voted to extend <br />the Manager's contract and paid the outside consultant to prepare a Performance Improvement <br />Plan for the Manager to complete in an effort to avoid any further incidents. <br />The District's insurance company has declined to pay on its loss claim given the circumstances <br />surrounding the embezzlement, The insurance company's outside legal counsel stated that the <br />District "misrepresented" its computer controls and should have had systems in place to detect <br />unusual activity. The District disputes this.' The District has retained additional counsel to <br />negotiate this matter. <br />The District indicated in its insurance application that no employee could control a process from <br />the beginning to the end, e.g., request a check, approve a voucher, and sign the check. The <br />District's internal controls required the Manager and a Board officer to approve requests for <br />payment and to sign on checks.' However, the finance department used signature stamps that <br />seemed to by-pass this control. Attorneys for the District argue that "the insurance company was <br />already aware of the lack of controls designed to prevent an embezzlement of this nature".' It <br />should be noted that insurance for these special districts frequently does not cover the costs for <br />attorneys, audits, or other costs associated with embezzlement. <br />Embezzlement may be more prevalent in districts than has been revealed to date. For example, in <br />addition to the District, employee fraud cases in the following County special or school districts <br />have come to light in the last two years alone. Although three of the cases do not relate to special <br />districts, the underlying problems, inadequate controls and oversight, are the same: <br />• Woodside Elementary School District <br />• Portola Valley School District <br />• Mid -Peninsula Water District (It should be noted that LAFCO's executive officer has <br />also recommended that this district be dissolved.) <br />• San Mateo County Community College District <br />The District embezzlement case may be the tip of the iceberg. As one interviewee stated, with so <br />many special districts in this county and counties throughout the Bay area and state, <br />"embezzlements are not unusual," which is no comfort to the taxpayers. However, with sound <br />internal financial controls and good management practices, the risk of embezzlement can be <br />minimized. <br />5 <br />Board Evaluations of the District Manager. <br />6 <br />Letter dated April 11, 2012, from Meredith, Weinstein & Numbers, LLP pg 3 (See Appendix Q. <br />7 <br />Ibid. <br />a <br />Ibid. <br />Z � abed - '311'J <br />