Laserfiche WebLink
8.A. - Page 495 <br />September 23, 2013 <br />Redwood City Council Members <br />Redwood City Planning Department <br />City Attorney <br />1017 Middlefield Road <br />Redwood City, CA 94064 <br />Dear honorable Mayor, Council Members, <br />City Attorney and Planning Department Members <br />The Laurel Way Plan Development Project has been in the works with the Redwood City <br />Planning Department since 2005. As a neighbor, l was kept in the loop by the individual land <br />owners of the Laurel Way Group and recently learned that Redwood City's Council will be <br />taking a decision on the project. <br />f 11 1 MV ' i M -W= IMATF.MWOUFFIWINUMS <br />On behalf of Laurel Way Joint Venture ("LWJV' ), I'd like to note the following: <br />(1) The project followed CEQA in detail and adequately analyzed the environmental impacts <br />to Laurel Way and to the immediate neighborhood. <br />(2) The CEQA analysis concluded that there are no significani iMpacts (after mitigation). <br />(3) The opponents have been raising the sande questions for 3 years and those questions have <br />been answered repeatedly for 3 years by Redwood City's environmental experts. Nothing <br />new was brought about. <br />(4) The Planning Department decided in 2011 to make changes to the Geotechnical <br />mitigation measures and those were successfully accomplished by Redwood City's <br />environmental experts. <br />(5) If Laurel Way were in any other neighboring city in the peninsula, it would have already <br />been developed and the individual land owners would have had a home to live in. <br />As a neighbor, we are in favor of having our neighborhood improve by this planned <br />development. Hence I am in favor of approving theEI Las_ vas -submitted and <br />allowing the individual land owners to developtheir heir private land „jIll L,auirel favL <br />With Regards, <br />Signature: i 60- <br />'Prvd bt,4,-+s Dated: 1' �'� 3 <br />(print name) <br />