Laserfiche WebLink
RE <br />10/07/2013 <br />approval of Planned Development Permit Application No. PD2013-04, and <br />received and considered oral and documentary evidence on the application; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS <br />, the Commission determined that the proposed Planned <br />Development Permit would further the purposes of and appropriately implement <br />the City of Redwood City General Plan, applicable provisions of the Redwood <br />City Municipal Code and Zoning Ordinance, and the 1410 Valota Road <br />Residential Project; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS <br />, on July 15, 2013, Kellie Guinto (“Appellant”) filed an appeal of <br />the Planning Commission approval of Planned Development Permit Application <br />No. PD2013-04; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS <br />, the City Council of the City of Redwood City (“City Council”) <br />is empowered by Article 48 (Appeals) to act upon appeals of the Planning <br />Commission; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS <br />, on October 7, 2013, the City Council conducted a public <br />hearing, in accordance with all applicable requirements of the State Planning and <br />Zoning Law and the Redwood City Zoning Ordinance, to consider ]the appeal of <br />the Planning Commission action on Planned Development Permit Application No. <br />PD2013-04; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS <br />, on October 7, 2013, Appellant and Applicant and all other <br />interested parties were given the opportunity to participate in the public hearing <br />through oral testimony and the submittal of written comments; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS <br />, on October 7, 2013, the City Council fully reviewed, <br />considered, and evaluated the staff reports prepared for the Project including the <br />attachments to the staff reports, oral and written public testimony, and all other <br /> <br />documents and evidence in the public record on the Project and the appeal. <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF <br />THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY AS FOLLOWS <br />: <br /> <br />Section 1. The City Council, having independently heard, considered, <br />and weighed all the evidence in the record presented on behalf of all parties and <br />being fully informed of the Project, the Planning Commission's decision, and the <br />two appeals, finds that Appellant has not shown, based on evidence in the <br />record, that the Planning Commission's decisions were made in error, that there <br />was an abuse of discretion by the Planning Commission, that the Planning <br />Commission's decision was otherwise improper, or that the City's notices, <br />ATTY/RESO.2916/ 1410 VALOTA PD APPEAL RESO RESO #15300 <br />REV: 09-27-13 VR MUFF #603 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br />